Studying Reading Quantum field theory by Weinberg books?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the suitability of specific physics and mathematics books for learning quantum field theory (QFT). A participant expresses difficulty with recommended texts due to their heavy mathematical content, seeking advice on whether to continue with these books or explore alternatives. Suggestions include starting with the Schwartz book for QFT, as well as other accessible texts like "Student Friendly QFT," "Srednicki QFT," "Hatfield," and "Peskin." Additionally, it is recommended to first strengthen understanding of advanced quantum mechanics with texts such as "Shankar" and "Sakurai," and to consider general relativity resources like "Hartle," "Dirac," "Carroll," and "Zee" before tackling QFT. The consensus is that a solid foundation in these subjects will facilitate a better grasp of QFT concepts.
Richa Sharma
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is it a good choice to read these books first or there's a better way. My professor recommended me these books but as I started them they had bulk of maths and really matter was not that understandable on my first try. I am an engineer. I read physics in free time I can get , so shall I go ahead with these books or please suggest better mathematics and Physics books.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't started QFT yet, but will likely start using this book - https://www.amazon.com/dp/1107034736/?tag=pfamazon01-20 - sometime next week. I've read a little bit of it, and I like how he introduces tensors. Try checking out the local or school library and see one that has a mathematical treatment you like.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Richa Sharma said:
Is it a good choice to read these books first or there's a better way. My professor recommended me these books but as I started them they had bulk of maths and really matter was not that understandable on my first try. I am an engineer. I read physics in free time I can get , so shall I go ahead with these books or please suggest better mathematics and Physics books.

I think the Weinberg texts are a bit of a tricky way to start off. I'd look at the book mentioned above (Schwartz) as well as books like Student Friendly QFT and Srednicki QFT. Maybe also Hatfield and Peskin.

It might be easier to first refresh advanced and intermediate QM (like Shankar and Sakurai Modern QM) if you need to and maybe go through GR first (books like Hartle, Dirac, Carroll and Zee). Basically get everything down well and then try QFT.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top