Real Analysis proof limits and bounded functions

kbrono
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f be a function and p\in . Assume that a\leqf(x)\leqb near p. Prove that if L= lim f(x) as x-->p Then L\in [a,b]




The Attempt at a Solution



I want to say that because f(x) is bounded by [a,b] that automatically implies that the Limit L is also bounded by [a,b] and is therefore an element. But i have a feeling I'm supposed to make a sequence from the Sequential Characterization of Limits...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the easiest approach is to do a proof by contradiction. Assume L is not in [a,b] and derive a contradiction. Funny, I think I gave the same advice yesterday.
 
Ah ok, thank you
 
Ok here's what I tried

Basically I said assume L is not an element of [a,b] Then since f(x) is only defined on the interval [a,b]/{p} Then [a,b]/{p} contains L. Therefore L is an element of [a,b]
 
A quick an "cheap" way to do this is by subtracting L from all sides of the inequality and then take the limit of each side. Finally, rearrange the resulting inequality.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top