Real Analysis proof limits and bounded functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof in real analysis concerning the limits of bounded functions. The original poster presents a function \( f \) that is bounded by \( a \) and \( b \) near a point \( p \) and seeks to prove that the limit \( L \) as \( x \) approaches \( p \) lies within the interval \([a, b]\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches, including proof by contradiction and the use of sequences to characterize limits. There is also mention of manipulating inequalities to derive conclusions about the limit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the proof. Some have suggested specific strategies, while others are questioning the assumptions and implications of their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the function being bounded and the definitions involved in limits, as well as the constraints of the problem setup.

kbrono
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f be a function and p\in . Assume that a\leqf(x)\leqb near p. Prove that if L= lim f(x) as x-->p Then L\in [a,b]




The Attempt at a Solution



I want to say that because f(x) is bounded by [a,b] that automatically implies that the Limit L is also bounded by [a,b] and is therefore an element. But i have a feeling I'm supposed to make a sequence from the Sequential Characterization of Limits...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the easiest approach is to do a proof by contradiction. Assume L is not in [a,b] and derive a contradiction. Funny, I think I gave the same advice yesterday.
 
Ah ok, thank you
 
Ok here's what I tried

Basically I said assume L is not an element of [a,b] Then since f(x) is only defined on the interval [a,b]/{p} Then [a,b]/{p} contains L. Therefore L is an element of [a,b]
 
A quick an "cheap" way to do this is by subtracting L from all sides of the inequality and then take the limit of each side. Finally, rearrange the resulting inequality.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K