Find Real Value of sin(i) Without i

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCanadian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the real value of sin(i), with an emphasis on using series expansion and imaginary exponentials. It is clarified that sin(i) results in a purely imaginary value, specifically sin(i) = (e^(-1) - e)/(2i). The series expansion reveals that only odd powers of i contribute, leading to the conclusion that the result cannot yield a real value. Participants highlight that the terms involving i in the expansion confirm the purely imaginary nature of sin(i). Overall, the consensus is that sin(i) does not have a real component.
TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I am calculating a value and want to find the real value of sin(i). I can use series expansion and only take the terms without i (correct?) but is there any nicer way to express the result of taking the real value of sin(i)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
micromass said:

I used the imaginary exponentials and found ## \sin(i) = \frac{e^{-1} - e}{2i} ## but this seems purely imaginary...from the sum expansion of sin, it appeared that there were real values for the even power terms. Any advice you have for addressing what I am missing here since I'm looking for the real value would be great!
 
Indeed, ##\sin(i)## is purely imaginary. If you look at the series expansion of ##\sin(i)##, you'll see that only ##i^{\text{odd power}}## appear in this expansion. And as you know, ##i^{\text{odd power}} = \pm i##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top