Realisability of the third law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Third law
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
My lecture notes had S=A{3nR[ln(T)]/2+nR[ln(V)]}. A arbitary, is the entropy equation for a monotomic ideal gas.

The third law demands S->0 as T->0. But as T->0 in the above equation, S -> -infinity assuming V fixed.

What is wrong?

Or is it the case that S-> -infinity is equivalent to minimum entropy?

V can be made arbitarily small but non zero so when T=0, the entropy must be smaller than any S when T is non zero. This can only happen if S-> -infinity as if it's a finite number than V can always be made smaller so that there exists a V and T such that S is smaller than S when zero T.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just realized that S can be combined to get S=AnR[ln(T^(3/2)V)] with A an arbitary constant than do S=BnR[ln(T^(3/2)V+1)] with B to scale S in order to account for the addition of 1 in the logarithm. So T=0 => S=0 and so the third law is satisfied. Is this accurate?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top