Rearrangeing Inverse Hyperbolic functions

Observables
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My brain is not working today. So can someone please tell me what I am doing wrong.

(^2 = squared)

coshy^2 - sinhy^2 = 1, how do I rearrange this for coshy^2

I keep getting: coshy^2 = 1 + Sinhy^2

The book that I'm looking at has it this way: coshy^2 = Sinhy^2 + 1

Thanks

Obs
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Time for brain overhaul. Both expressions evaluate the same.
 
Observables said:
Hi,

My brain is not working today. So can someone please tell me what I am doing wrong.

(^2 = squared)

coshy^2 - sinhy^2 = 1, how do I rearrange this for coshy^2

I keep getting: coshy^2 = 1 + Sinhy^2

The book that I'm looking at has it this way: coshy^2 = Sinhy^2 + 1

Thanks

Obs

Hey observables and welcome to the forums.

The easiest way to find if the book is right (ie coshy^2 - sinhy^2 = 1) is to just use the definition of sinhy and coshy.

sinhy = 1/2 (e^x - e^-x)
coshy = 1/2(e^x + e^-x)

so sinhy^2 = 1/4 [e^2x - 2 + e^-2x)
coshy^2 = 1/4(e^2x + 2 - e^-2x)

coshy^2 - sinhy^2 = 1/2 - (-1/2) = 1
 
SteamKing said:
Time for brain overhaul. Both expressions evaluate the same.

Hi,

I realized that, but I couldn't figure out how the book was doing the rearranging. I've been differentiating a few Inverse Hyperbolic functions, and I thought the reason that the book rearranged differently to me was that somewhere down the line it would become clear why it was done.

Obs.
 
chiro said:
Hey observables and welcome to the forums.

The easiest way to find if the book is right (ie coshy^2 - sinhy^2 = 1) is to just use the definition of sinhy and coshy.

sinhy = 1/2 (e^x - e^-x)
coshy = 1/2(e^x + e^-x)

so sinhy^2 = 1/4 [e^2x - 2 + e^-2x)
coshy^2 = 1/4(e^2x + 2 - e^-2x)

coshy^2 - sinhy^2 = 1/2 - (-1/2) = 1

Hi Chiro,

Thanks for the info.

Obs.
 
Gezzz breakfast time must be confusing at your place. Trying to decide whether to have "eggs and toast" or "toast and eggs". It must keep you occupied for hours.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top