Rearranging equation in Dirac-notation for 3 particles (quantumteleportation)

  • Thread starter Thread starter keen23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
keen23
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello all!
I try to follow the computation in my textbook (nielsen, quantum computation) and miss a step.

Homework Statement


They say the following state
[tex]|p\rangle=\frac{1}{2}\big[a (|0\rangle+|1\rangle)(|00\rangle+|11\rangle)+b(|0\rangle-|1\rangle)(|10\rangle+|01\rangle)\big][/tex]
could be rearranged to
[tex]|p\rangle=\frac{1}{2}\big[|00\rangle(a|0\rangle+b |1\rangle)+|01\rangle(a|1\rangle+b|0\rangle)+|10\rangle(a|0\rangle-b|1\rangle)+|11\rangle(a|1\rangle-b|0\rangle)}\big][/tex].

But I don't see how.

(The start state comes from combining an arbitrary state a|0>+b|1> with an epr-pair in bell-state, then using CNOT for particles 1 and 2, then Hadamardgate on particle 1, well, I think that's not important for my question).

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


With normal expansion I get:
[tex]|p\rangle=\frac{1}{2}\big[a|0\rangle|00\rangle+a|0\rangle|11\rangle+a|1\rangle|00\rangle+a|1\rangle|11\rangle+b|0\rangle|10\rangle+b|0\rangle|01\rangle-b|1\rangle|10\rangle-b|1\rangle|01\rangle[/tex]
[tex] =|00\rangle a(|0\rangle +|1\rangle )+|01\rangle b(|0\rangle -|1\rangle )+|10\rangle b(|0\rangle -|1\rangle )+|11\rangle a(|0\rangle +|1\rangle )[/tex]

So "normal" expansion seems not to be the right way, but how shall I do it? Even if I think about the physical meaning I don't see what's wrong.
Maybe someone has more experience?
Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your mistake is that you're setting |00>|1> and |1>|00> equal -- but surely the first one equals |001> and the second equals |100>, which are different?
 
Oh no! Yes, sure. that was my mistake.
Thank you!