Rearranging Formulas for a and b: Common Mistakes and Correct Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rearranging the formula p(a + b) = q(a - b) to isolate variables a and b. The user expresses confusion over their answers differing from the "real answers" provided. A key point is that while the user's calculations are correct, they differ in appearance due to the order of operations and signs. For variable a, multiplying through by -1 can align the answers, while for b, simply switching the order of p and q resolves the discrepancy. The conversation emphasizes that both approaches yield equivalent results despite the differences in presentation.
thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have to rearrange the formula to get a and b on their own. The real answers are different to mine:

p(a + b) = q (a-b) [a]

pa + pb = qa - qb

pa-qa = -qb - pb

a (p-q) = -qb - pb

a = (-qb - pb)/(p-q)

and the real answer is:

(qb + pb)/(q -p)

it's differnet to mine!

And finding rearranging to get b is

p(a + b) = q (a-b) [a]

pa + pb = qa - qb

pa-qa = -qb - pb

pb + qb = qa - pa

b(p + q) = qa - pa

b = (qa - pa)/(p + q)

and the real answer is

(pa + pa)/(q + p)

Errrrrr!

Can someone so me where i went wrong

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not that your answers are wrong, I think they are done properly. They just don't look exactly the same. For "a", I think that perhaps if you multiplied through by -1 after a(p-q)=-qb-pb, and arranged it based on that, your answer would turn out looking the same as the "real answer". To check, you can plug numbers into the equations and see if they turn out the same.
For "b", just change the order of p and q, it's addition anyway so it won't change anything.
 
(-qb - pb)/(p-q) is equivalent to (qb + pb)/(q -p) just multiply top and bottom by -1.

for the second one you have may a misprint... check what you have typed
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top