Recomposing trig and hyp functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on recomposing expressions involving arcsine and hyperbolic functions, specifically arcsin(cosx), arsinh(coshx), arcsin(coshx), and arsinh(cosx). The user seeks clarification on how to derive square root expressions for the first two and expresses uncertainty about the last two without resorting to complex numbers. It is noted that arcsin(cos(x)) can be simplified using the relation cos(x) = sin(π/2 - x), leading to arcsin(cos(x)) = π/2 - x. For hyperbolic functions, the Pythagorean identity cosh²(x) - sinh²(x) = 1 is highlighted, and there's a suggestion to use complex numbers for mixed types. The conversation emphasizes the differences between trigonometric and hyperbolic function compositions.
Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I want to recompose the expression of the form:

arcsin(cosx) , arsinh(coshx), arcsin(coshx), arsinh(cosx)

but I can't figure out how this is supposed to work :( I expect square root expressions for the first two and I'm not sure one can recompose the last two without using complex numbers.

Could someone please help me in a way? Thanks in advance :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Firstly understand that problems of the form arcsin(cos(x)) are quite different to problems of the form cos(arcsin(x)).

For the first type simply use the "complement" relation that cos(x) = sin(Pi/2-x) to write,

\sin^{-1}(\cos(x)) = \sin^{-1}(\sin(\frac{\pi}{2}-x)) = \frac{\pi}{2}-x

{or 90-x if you prefer to use degrees}.Since you "were expecting square root type expressions" I assume you where actually thinking about the opposite type of problem such as cos(arcsin(x)).

Here you need to use the relation that \cos(x) = \sqrt{1-(\sin x)^2}

Making this substitution you get,

\cos(\sin^{-1}(x)) = \sqrt{1-(\sin (\sin^{-1} x))^2}
= \sqrt(1-x^2)
 
Last edited:
Thanks, uart!

And what about the hyperbolic functions? There is no Pythagoras for hyperb. functions, is there?

And the mixed type in the field of the real numbers is quite unclear to me :(
 
For hyp-trig functions the equivalent of the pythagorean relation is

\cosh^2(x) - \sinh^2(x) = 1Yeah for the mixed ones I thinked I'd have to go complex and use cosh(x) = cos(i x) and sinh(x) = -i sin(i x). Maybe someone else can offer a better solution there.
 
Last edited:
So it's:

\cosh(\arsinhx)=\sqrt{1+\sinh(\arsinhx)}=\sqrt{1+x^2}


() is suppose to have \arsinhx inside - what's wrong with the Latex typing it?


And what do we do when we have: arsinh(coshx) hmmmm?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top