Red Shift caused by space itself ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the idea that redshift may be caused by the structure of space itself rather than the recession of distant objects. It suggests that if space is not empty but has a complex structure containing energy, light waves could be affected as they traverse this space, leading to a redshift phenomenon. The concept posits that this structured space could produce particles under stress, indicating a form of physicality to space. The conversation also touches on the implications of space being distorted by massive objects, which could further influence light's behavior. Ultimately, the debate centers on whether space is expanding or if light's redshift is a result of its interaction with the structure of space.
nigel johnstone
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
"Red Shift" caused by space itself ??

Perhaps the distant objects are not receding at all.
If "space" is not empty, but rather is a complex structure,
probably containing energy which can be released (wouldn't
we just love to know how), then as light "waves" - I prefer
to call them emanations - proceed through vast tracts of
structured "empty" space, perhaps the light is "tugged" by
the structure. This tugging would affect the red end of the
spectrum more than the UV end... thus causing a red shift.
N'est-ce pas ?

This structure of "empty" space can be shown capable of
producing opposite particles under stress.
That is... apply force to the structure and out pop particles-
albeit ones which "cancel" each other out, it is true.

If space can be distorted (by massive objects) then it must have
some kind of structure.
If there was literally nothing there, it could not be "bent" (as
in Einstein's "rubber sheet" example of orbits.
N'est-ce pas ?

Ergo, light passes through a structure that could impede its progress
or distort its progress.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Let me get this right...

Are you saying that space is expanding and the objects arent actually tavelling away, or that space isn't expanding and it just affects light to make it appear as though space is expanding?! Because if its the first one, you shouldn't be on these forums! If it's the second one... very unlikely
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...

Similar threads

Back
Top