Redshift and blueshift in relativistic doppler effect

qazadex
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for an intuitive explanation for the redshift and blueshift phenonema that occurs when a light ray is emitted transversely.

According to wikipedia:

Assuming the objects are not accelerated, light emitted when the objects are closest together will be received some time later, at reception the amount of redshift will be 1/γ.

Light received when the objects are closest together was emitted some time earlier, at reception the amount of blueshift is γ.

Now these expressions can be derived using this formula(a generalized version of the doppler shift):
\frac{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}{1+\frac{v}{c}\cos{\theta}}

However, I'm trying to understand based on the principles of time dilation. The redshift situation makes sense: because of time dilation, successive wavefronts arrive by a factor of λ slower according to the receiver, so the f' is 1/λ * f. However, this logic fails with the blueshifting. A way in which the blueshifting expression could be derived is by looking at the situation from the source of the light, and seeing waves get absorbed by a factor f γ slower, which would lead to the above expression for blueshifting. However, I'm not sure why these frames of reference would need to be chosen.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you already answered your own question. These are indeed just the time dilation factors as seen from either the source or the receiver points of view. The point is that the trajectory of the ray is perpendicular to the relative velocities between the frames. In the red shift case the trajectory is perpendicular from the point of view of the receiver while in the other case it is perpendicular from the point of view of the source. When the trajectory is perpendicular, Doppler effect is given by time dilation alone.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
qazadex said:
I'm looking for an intuitive explanation for the redshift and blueshift phenonema that occurs when a light ray is emitted transversely.

According to wikipedia:

Assuming the objects are not accelerated, light emitted when the objects are closest together will be received some time later, at reception the amount of redshift will be 1/γ.


I would say:

When the objects are closest together according to the receiver, then the amount of redshift will be 1/γ according to the receiver.

And that is because the reciever sees the distance staying constant at that point, so he observes the time dilation and nothing else.
 
Thanks for the answers: it makes pretty much perfect sense now.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
6K
Back
Top