Redshift, Earth's orbital speed, and the speed of light

AI Thread Summary
The Earth orbits the Sun at approximately 30 km/s, with a total change of 60 km/s over the year. Redshift measurements can reflect this orbital speed, but the accuracy depends on the measurement technology, with top spectrometers capable of detecting changes as small as 1 m/s. Factors such as Earth's rotation, lunar influence, and the Solar System's velocity of about 230 km/s around the Milky Way are accounted for in redshift calculations. Additionally, all motion is relative, and there is no absolute "speed through the universe," though velocities relative to the cosmic microwave background are considered. Accurate redshift measurements incorporate these various speeds to ensure precision.
iantresman
Messages
67
Reaction score
2
The Earth is moving around the Sun at around 30km/s, a change of 60km/s over the course of the year.
  1. Presumably, measurements of the speed of light would show a redshift up to ±30km/s? Are redshift measurements this accurate?
  2. Likewise, the speed of the Solar System around the Milky Way, is estimated to be about 230 km/s, and the Milky Way is moving at some speed through the universe. Do these need to be these factored into redshift measurements?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
iantresman said:
Presumably, measurements of the speed of light would show a redshift up to ±30km/s? Are redshift measurements this accurate?
It depends on the measurement. The best spectrometers are sensitive to about 1m/s for single stars, those are used to search exoplanets.
The orbit of earth, the rotation of Earth (still several hundred meters per second) and the influence of the moon (~10m/s) are well-known, so they are always taken into account where they are relevant.

iantresman said:
Likewise, the speed of the Solar System around the Milky Way, is estimated to be about 230 km/s, and the Milky Way is moving at some speed through the universe.
There is no "speed through the universe" as all motion is relative. We have some known velocity relative to the local cosmic microwave background, this is taken into account.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top