samsara15
- 17
- 0
Wouldn't the Redshift result in decreased heat from far distant stars, resulting in an equilibirum temperature, much lower than the average star?
The discussion centers on the implications of redshift in relation to the temperature of distant stars and its connection to Olber's Paradox. Participants agree that redshift leads to a decrease in heat from far distant stars, suggesting a lower equilibrium temperature than that of average stars. This reasoning supports the Big Bang theory and the concept of an expanding universe, contrasting with the static universe model that Olber's Paradox challenges. The conversation highlights that a static universe would not exhibit the observed redshift, reinforcing the evidence for cosmic expansion.
PREREQUISITESAstronomers, astrophysicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of the universe's structure and evolution.
samsara15 said:Wouldn't the Redshift result in decreased heat from far distant stars, resulting in an equilibirum temperature, much lower than the average star?