Reduced oscillation on higher altitudes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillation
AI Thread Summary
A simple pendulum taken from sea level to a high mountain will oscillate slightly slower due to reduced gravity at higher altitudes. The period of oscillation is determined by the equation T = 2π√(l/g), where g represents the acceleration due to gravity. As gravity decreases at higher elevations, the period increases, resulting in slower oscillation. The discussion clarifies that while mass remains constant regardless of gravity, the pendulum's behavior is influenced by changes in gravitational force. Thus, the correct answer to the initial question is that the pendulum oscillates slightly slower at the mountain's peak.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


If a simple pendulum is taken from sea level to the top of a high mountain and started at the same angle of five degrees, it would oscillate at the top of the mountain
a) slightly slower
b) slightly faster
c) at exactly the same frequency
d) not at all - it would stop
e) none of the above

Homework Equations


Period = ##T = 2 \pi \sqrt {\frac{l}{g}}##

The Attempt at a Solution


The correct answer is (a). Does this have to do with gravity being less on the mountain?

If gravity were reduced, force (and in turn acceleration) would be reduced, which indicates a slower velocity. But period, according to the equation above, doesn't depend on mass...

Thank you all for clearing my confusion up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calpalned said:

Homework Statement


If a simple pendulum is taken from sea level to the top of a high mountain and started at the same angle of five degrees, it would oscillate at the top of the mountain
a) slightly slower
b) slightly faster
c) at exactly the same frequency
d) not at all - it would stop
e) none of the above

Homework Equations


Period = ##T = 2 \pi \sqrt {\frac{l}{g}}##

The Attempt at a Solution


The correct answer is (a). Does this have to do with gravity being less on the mountain?

If gravity were reduced, force (and in turn acceleration) would be reduced, which indicates a slower velocity. But period, according to the equation above, doesn't depend on mass...

Thank you all for clearing my confusion up.
Mass doesn't depend upon gravity either.
 
SammyS said:
Mass doesn't depend upon gravity either.
If that's the case, then why does the pendulum oscillate slower?
 
Calpalned said:
If that's the case, then why does the pendulum oscillate slower?
Weight does depend upon gravity. Mass doesn't.
 
Calpalned said:
If that's the case, then why does the pendulum oscillate slower?
What is g on the mountaintop compared to sea level?
 
rude man said:
What is g on the mountaintop compared to sea level?
g (gravity) is less. But SammyS said that "mass doesn't depend on gravity". So does gravity matter or not?
 
Calpalned said:
g (gravity) is less. But SammyS said that "mass doesn't depend on gravity".

He's right. The mass of an object doesn't depend on gravity. A man has the same mass on the moon as on earth.

So does gravity matter or not?

Look carefully at the equation. It contains a term for g but not m.
 
Back
Top