Reducibility tensor product representation

Yoran91
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Say I have two irreducible representations \rho and \pi of a group G on vector spaces V and W. Then I construct a tensor product representation
\rho \otimes \pi : G\to \mathrm{GL}\left(V_1 \otimes V_2\right)
by
\left[\rho \otimes \pi \right] (g) v\otimes w = \rho (g) v \otimes \pi (g) w.

I now wish to know whether or not this representation is reducible or irreducible. If it cannot be determined, then I wish to know what further conditions imply reducibility or irreducibility. However, I have not been able to find an answer to this anywhere. Can anyone provide some insight?

Thanks for any help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I cannot imagine that (in general) irreducibility will be conserved. The new components could lie somehow diagonal in ##V\otimes W##. For linear groups there is e.g. a theorem which says: If ##\lambda## is a dominant weight according to a maximal torus of ##G##, that is all coefficients of ##\lambda## are non-negative, then there is an irreducible ##G## module of highest weight ##\lambda##.

See: James E. Humphreys, Linear Algebraic Groups.

Your question is in its generality too broad to be answered as it depends on unknowns as which groups, or which fields.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
984
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top