Refer to aneutronic reactions as though they are fusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdhuntsman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion Reactions
AI Thread Summary
A discussion on fusors highlights the confusion surrounding aneutronic reactions and their classification as fusion. The pB11 reaction is cited as an example, where a proton fuses with B11 to create C12, which subsequently fissions into helium nuclei. This process is characterized as fusion initially, despite producing lighter elements, contrasting with traditional fission where a neutron interacts with a heavy nucleus. The distinction lies in the initial fusion step, which is essential to understanding the nature of these reactions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarifying the terminology used in nuclear physics.
cdhuntsman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have been reading about fusors. The articles usually refer to aneutronic reactions as though they are fusion. But are they really? For example, the pB11 reaction yields He, but this is some sort of fission isn't it? I.e. we start of with a heavier isotope and produce lighter ones through particle bombardment (only with protons instead of neutrons as in a fission reactor). Can someone explain why the view is the way it is?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
cdhuntsman said:
I have been reading about fusors. The articles usually refer to aneutronic reactions as though they are fusion. But are they really? For example, the pB11 reaction yields He, but this is some sort of fission isn't it? I.e. we start of with a heavier isotope and produce lighter ones through particle bombardment (only with protons instead of neutrons as in a fission reactor). Can someone explain why the view is the way it is?
That's a good question. However, the proton fuses with the nucleus of B11 forming an energetic C12 atom, which does more or less fission into three He nuclei, which are heavier than the p, but lighter than B11. But the initial reaction is fusion.

On the other hand, in fission, a neutron 'fuses' with a fissile nucleus, e.g. U235 or Pu239. I suppose the focus then was on the fissioning of the heavier nucleus into lighter nuclei and other neutrons.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top