Reference Book Griffiths-Introduction to Electrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
Many users express difficulty with Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics," citing disconnected explanations and challenging problems. Alternatives suggested include Wangsness, praised for its clarity and presentation, and "Fundamentals of E and M" by Lorain and Corson, which is noted for being slightly easier and more detailed. The discussion highlights the need for accessible resources in electromagnetism that cater to varying levels of understanding. Overall, users are seeking more effective reference materials to enhance their comprehension and problem-solving skills in the subject.
mike217
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a reference book to use besides Griffiths. I find the explanations in Griffiths to be disconnected, and I have to work very very hard to make out what he is trying to explain. And then when I try the problems in the book I am handicapped (completely stuck). Most of the books I found were either at a higher or a lower level then Griffiths.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wangsness...It is in my opinion the best undergrad book in E&M, puts Griffiths to shame for clarity and uniformness of presentation.
 
Grifiths is my favorite E and M text at that level. That said, if you don't like Grifiths, you might prefer "Fundamentals of E and M" by Lorain and Corson. It is slightly easier than Grifiths, and they go into more detail.
 
Thank you very much guys. You just saved me from failing my course.
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Classical Griffiths or Jackson for Electrodynamics?
Replies
26
Views
5K
Quantum Looking for upper division modern physics book
Replies
9
Views
2K
Quantum mechanics book recommendations
Replies
10
Views
709
Need a book on Modern Physics to supplement Griffiths QM
Replies
17
Views
492
Classical Confusion between Electrodynamics texts
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
I Wave motion and a stretched string
Replies
3
Views
1K
Use relativity and the Larmor formula to calculate Lienard's formula
Replies
2
Views
2K
Classical Griffiths Electrodynamics vs Pollack Electromagnetism.
Replies
1
Views
3K
Studying Watching video lectures along with solving problems in a book?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Problem using Griffiths Intro to Quantum Mechanics
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top