Reference Book Griffiths-Introduction to Electrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
Many users express difficulty with Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics," citing disconnected explanations and challenging problems. Alternatives suggested include Wangsness, praised for its clarity and presentation, and "Fundamentals of E and M" by Lorain and Corson, which is noted for being slightly easier and more detailed. The discussion highlights the need for accessible resources in electromagnetism that cater to varying levels of understanding. Overall, users are seeking more effective reference materials to enhance their comprehension and problem-solving skills in the subject.
mike217
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a reference book to use besides Griffiths. I find the explanations in Griffiths to be disconnected, and I have to work very very hard to make out what he is trying to explain. And then when I try the problems in the book I am handicapped (completely stuck). Most of the books I found were either at a higher or a lower level then Griffiths.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wangsness...It is in my opinion the best undergrad book in E&M, puts Griffiths to shame for clarity and uniformness of presentation.
 
Grifiths is my favorite E and M text at that level. That said, if you don't like Grifiths, you might prefer "Fundamentals of E and M" by Lorain and Corson. It is slightly easier than Grifiths, and they go into more detail.
 
Thank you very much guys. You just saved me from failing my course.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Classical Griffiths or Jackson for Electrodynamics?
Replies
26
Views
5K
Quantum Looking for upper division modern physics book
Replies
9
Views
2K
Quantum mechanics book recommendations
Replies
10
Views
628
Need a book on Modern Physics to supplement Griffiths QM
Replies
17
Views
412
Classical Confusion between Electrodynamics texts
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
I Wave motion and a stretched string
Replies
3
Views
1K
Use relativity and the Larmor formula to calculate Lienard's formula
Replies
2
Views
2K
Classical Griffiths Electrodynamics vs Pollack Electromagnetism.
Replies
1
Views
3K
Studying Watching video lectures along with solving problems in a book?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Problem using Griffiths Intro to Quantum Mechanics
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top