MHB Reflecting B(3,-1) on Line g: 4y + x - 15 = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Mirror
AI Thread Summary
The reflection of point B(3, -1) across line g results in point B'(5, 7). The equation of line g is given as 4y + x - 15 = 0, but calculations show that the correct line should be 4y + x - 16 = 0, which is not listed among the options. The midpoint of the two points is (4, 3), and the slope of the line perpendicular to BB' is -1/4. There is a suggestion that option A may contain a typo, as the derived equation closely resembles it.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
The point B(3, -1) is reflected by the line g and results in B'(5, 7). The equation of line g is ...
A. 4y + x - 15 = 0
B. 4y + x - 9 = 0
C. 4y + x + 15 = 0
D. 4y - x - 15 = 0
E. 4y - x - 9 = 0

Since I didn't know how to approach the problem in a formal, textbook way, I tried to get... creative. The point of reflection must be exactly in the middle of (3, -1) and (5, 7), that is, (4, 3). Since the mirror must be a line perpendicular to BB' (which has the slope 4) and going through (4, 3), the slope of the mirror is $$-\frac{1}{4}$$ and I substituted it in the $$y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$$ equation. This is what I got:
$$y-3=-\frac{1}{4}(x-4)$$
4(y - 3) = -(x - 4)
4y - 12 = -x + 4
4y + x - 12 - 4 = 0
4y + x - 16 = 0 which is not in any of the options, but really close to the option A. Can we just assume that the option A was a typo? Or did I make a mistake somewhere?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What I would do is observe that the line must pass through the midpoint of the two given points, and be perpendicular to the line through the two given points.The midpoint is:

$$\left(\frac{3+5}{2},\frac{-1+7}{2}\right)=(4,3)$$

The slope is:

$$m=-\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta y}=-\frac{5-3}{7+1}=-\frac{1}{4}$$

Thus, our line is:

$$y-3=-\frac{1}{4}(x-4)$$

Or:

$$4y-12=-x+4$$

Or:

$$4y+x-16=0$$

I agree with your answer. :)
 
Isn't that basically what I did?
 
Monoxdifly said:
Isn't that basically what I did?

Yes...it's just easier for me to work the problem and then compare results.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top