Reflection at a spherical surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of image properties for an object placed in front of a concave mirror. The original poster encounters a discrepancy in the sign of the radius of curvature, questioning whether their lecture notes are incorrect in stating that it should be negative. Participants clarify that concave mirrors have a positive focal length and that the sign convention used is crucial for accurate calculations. They suggest that the Gaussian sign convention, which aligns the equations for mirrors and lenses, is beneficial for students despite some initial confusion regarding object positioning. Ultimately, understanding the correct sign convention is essential for solving optics problems accurately.
Jon.G
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object 0.6cm tall is placed 16.5cm to the left of the vertex of a concave spherical mirror having a radius of curvature of 22.0cm.
Determine the position, size, orientation and nature of the image.


Homework Equations


\frac {1}{S} + \frac {1}{S'} = \frac {1}{f} = \frac {2}{R}


The Attempt at a Solution


\frac {1}{16.5}+ \frac {1}{S'} = \frac {2}{-22}
\frac {1}{S'} = -\frac{1}{11} - \frac {1}{16.5}
S' = -6.6cm
However, the answer given is 33.0cm, which you get when R = +22.0 , not -22.0
In my lecture notes is definitely says that the radius of curvature for a concave mirror is negative.
Are the notes wrong? Or is there something I am missing?

(Using 33.0cm as S' I can get the answers to the other parts of the question, I just want a little bit of help in understanding why the radius of curvature is positive)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The focal length is taken positive in case of a concave mirror. F=|R|/2

ehild
 
The notes are wrong. Concave mirrors and convex lenses have positive focal distance while convex mirrors and concave lenses have negative focal distances.
 
dauto said:
The notes are wrong. Concave mirrors and convex lenses have positive focal distance while convex mirrors and concave lenses have negative focal distances.
I'm not sure that there is a universally agreed convention. The important thing is to pick a convention and ensure all your equations conform to it.

The convention used at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_curvature_(optics) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_length seems good to me. You treat the incoming ray as coming from the negative side to the positive. The radius of the surface is always taken as the offset from the surface to the centre of curvature. So we have concave negative, convex positive whether it be a mirror, or the entry surface of a lens, but reversed for the exit surface of a lens.
Correspondingly, the focal length formula for a lens uses 1/R1 - 1/R2. Thus, for a biconvex lens we get a positive minus a negative, and the curvatures reinforce.

The error in the OP is the sign of S.
 
Yes there are alternative sign conventions but the one I described is the easiest.
 
dauto said:
Yes there are alternative sign conventions but the one I described is the easiest.
How so?
 
haruspex said:
How so?

Gaussian sign convention is easier for students that are being introduced to the subject because
* The equations used for mirrors and lenses become identical
* A minus sign for image location corresponds to a virtual image and the same thing is true for an object

The disadvantage is
* The sign convention for an object seems backwards (the left sign of the axis is negative, they are not used to that)

My experience is that students find the advantages to outweigh the disadvantages
 
Back
Top