Reflection of a plane mirror and phase shift

AI Thread Summary
A linearly polarized beam reflecting off a plane mirror with a higher index does not change the direction of its polarization due to the 180-degree phase shift. However, the reflection coefficients differ for waves polarized in the plane of incidence versus those perpendicular to it, leading to changes in the ratio of these components. When both components are present, the polarization direction can change upon reflection. In the case of metal mirrors and non-normal incidence, the situation becomes more complex, resulting in elliptically polarized light. Fresnel's equations provide insight into these phenomena, particularly regarding phase shifts and polarization changes.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I think I have confused myself: If I have a linearly polarized beam incident on a plane mirror with higher index, will the 180-degree phase shift change the direction of the polarization? Say, from lying in the 1st-3rd quadrant to lying in the 2nd-4th quadrant? Personally I would say no, since the mirror has no way to "tell" what the 1st-3rd quadrant actually is. But I am not 100% sure my argument works.


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pi phase change during reflection does not change the direction of polarization.
But: the coefficient of reflection is different for waves polarized in the plane of incidence and for those, perpendicular to the plane(TM and TE mode waves).
If the incident wave has both parallel and perpendicular components, the ratio of the components will change upon reflection, and so does the direction of polarization.
When the mirror is from metal, the situation is even more complicated at non-normal incidence, as not only the amplitudes of the wave components change but their phases, too. Therefore the reflected light becomes elliptically polarized.

ehild
 
Hi

Thanks, do you have a reference where these things are explained?Niles.
 
It is any handbook of Optics, O.S. Heavens, Optical Properties of Thin Films, Academic Press, 1955, for example. Google "Fresnel coefficients", "polarization of light by reflection".

ehild
 
Hi again

Ok, so from Fresnel's equations I see that the component perpendicular to the plane of incidence gets an additional phase of 180 degrees upon reflection. That means that there is a net relative change between the components of 180 degrees upon reflection. But this is practically just what a half-wave plate does?

Where am I wrong here?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top