Reflection of Light: Solving Physics Problem on Glass Cube Surface Coverage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Electro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
The physics problem involves determining which parts of a solid glass cube's faces need to be covered to obscure a central spot from all viewing angles. The cube has a refractive index of 1.5 and measures 10 mm on each edge. The challenge lies in understanding how light refraction affects visibility, as the spot may be hidden from some angles but visible from others. The goal is to identify the necessary surface coverage to ensure the spot remains unseen regardless of the observer's position. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the implications of the problem and how to calculate the required surface area coverage.
Electro
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hello to all,
I have a physics problem regarding reflection of light.

A solid glass cube, of edge 10 mm and n = 1.5 has a small spot at its center. a) What parts of each cube face must be covered to prevent the spot from being seen, no matter what the direction of viewing? b) What fraction of the cube surface must be covered?

The point is that I don't get what the problem is implying. Anyone can give a hint or just a startup clue?
Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When viewed from certain angles, the spot would not be visible due to bending (refraction) of light; however, the spot would be visible at certain other points. It's asking what must be 'blacked out,' so to speak, in order for the spot never to be seen from the areas where refraction wouldn't prevent it from being seen, and then, what fraction (how much) of the surface area must be covered.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top