Reflection of Waves on a String: Understanding Mass and Phase Differences"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aequiveri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Wave
AI Thread Summary
When a pulse travels down a string with varying mass, the reflection behavior depends on the mass ratio. If the mass of the string decreases (m1 > m2), the wave reflects with the same phase, while if the mass increases (m1 < m2), it reflects 180 degrees out of phase. The discussion raises questions about the theoretical and mathematical underpinnings of these observations, particularly regarding amplitude consistency. There is a suggestion that the Fresnel equations might provide a theoretical framework for understanding this behavior. The conversation concludes with a consideration of how these reflections contribute to the formation of standing waves.
Aequiveri
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
If I send a pulse down a string with mass (m1), consider what happens at a point where the mass of the string becomes (m2):

i) If m1 > m2, the wave is reflected with the same phase as the incident wave.
ii) If m1 < m2, the wave is reflected 180 degrees out of phase with the incident wave.

(Let's ignore any transmitted wave)

Why is this so? Is it an experimental fact, or is there some kind of theoretical/mathematical explanation for this behavior.

And I can see mathematically why it is the case that if m2 is infinitely larger than m1 (i.e. no transmitted wave - the end of the string is nailed down) the amplitude of the reflected wave is equal to the incident wave, but this seems physically inconsistent to me; if (ii) is true, shouldn't the reflected wave be equal to the "negative" amplitude of the incident wave?

I appreciate any insight you can give me. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps the Fresnel equations provide the necessary theoretical explanation?
 
Aequiveri said:
the amplitude of the reflected wave is equal to the incident wave, but this seems physically inconsistent to me; if (ii) is true, shouldn't the reflected wave be equal to the "negative" amplitude of the incident wave?

I think the incident and reflected wave amplitudes ARE opposite; isn't the result a standing wave on the incident wave side of the barrier?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top