Refraction at a spherical surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the image distance for a speck of dust located inside a glass sphere submerged in glycerin. The object distance is determined to be 8 cm, combining the distance from the center of the sphere to the dust and the radius of the sphere. Participants clarify that the refractive index of the glass is 1.50, while the glycerin's refractive index is 1.47, leading to confusion over the correct assignment of n1 and n2 in the formula. The relationship between the object distance and the light source is also debated, particularly regarding the sign convention for distances in optics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding the refraction principles at play in this scenario.
Kurokari
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A speck of dust is 3cm from the center of a glass sphere with radius of 5cm. If the glass sphere is placed in a tank of glycerin with a refractive index of 1.47, find the image distance, as viewed along the diameter through the speck of dust from the far side.
Refractive index of glass is 1.50

Homework Equations



(n1/u) + (n2/v) = |n2-n1|/r

The Attempt at a Solution



The solution is actually given, but I want to confirm what I understand from the solution given is absolutely correct.

The object distance is given that u = 5 + 3 = 8cm
This means that the speck of dust is the glass sphere, and since the question says we're looking from the far side, it means we're looking at the other side, that would explain the 5 + 3 = 8 cm.

In addition, since the we're looking that way, the light source and the object are on the same side of the spherical surface, does this mean object distance is positive?

Lastly, the n1 given was 1.50, which means n1 is the index of refraction of where your object is, and n2 the index of refraction of glycerin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kurokari said:
The object distance is given that u = 5 + 3 = 8cm
This means that the speck of dust is the glass sphere, and since the question says we're looking from the far side, it means we're looking at the other side, that would explain the 5 + 3 = 8 cm.
Yep - "other side" begs the question "other side from what?" The only marker you have is the dust position.
In addition, since the we're looking that way, the light source and the object are on the same side of the spherical surface,
The light "source" is the object. When is it not?
does this mean object distance is positive?
I always get confused by that too :( Consider, the glass is acting as a lens - sort-of. As light coming from the dust is concerned, it travels through a bunch of glass, hits a spherical interface (the "lens" position) and then travels through some glycerin.
How would you normally figure the object distance for that?

Alternatively you can just re-derive the equation geometrically and use whatever signs you like.

Lastly, the n1 given was 1.50, which means n1 is the index of refraction of where your object is, and n2 the index of refraction of glycerin?
If the object is inside glass then why wouldn't the refractive index where the object is be the refractive index of glass?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top