Refraction through a nonuniform medium

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkfall13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medium Refraction
darkfall13
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A plane electromagnetic wave refracts in a nonuniform medium. The ray trajectory is known,
y = a \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{x}{2a} \right)^2 \right]
where a=const.

a) Plot y(x)

b) From the slope of the curve find the angle \theta \left( y \right) which the k-vector makes with respect to the surface normal (parallel to the y-axis)

c) Using Snell's law, find the refractive index as a function of height, n\left(y\right)

Homework Equations



n_i sin \left( \theta_i \right) = n_t sin \left( \theta_t \right)

The Attempt at a Solution



a) simple downward facing parabola with y-intercept at a, x-intercepts at -2a and 2a

b) It hinted at what to do by stating the slope of the curve which is the derivative of the trajectory.

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{d}{dx} a \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{x}{2a} \right)^2 \right]
= a \left[ -2 \left( \frac{x}{2a} \right) \left( \frac{1}{2a} \right) \right] = \frac{-x}{2a}

The slope is thought of as "rise over run" so if we're looking for the angle with respect to the y-axis the triangle formed from the tangential to the trajectory and the y-axis the sides of the triangle given from the slope is adjacent and opposite.

cot \theta = \frac{-x}{2a}
\theta \left( y \right) = tan \frac{-x}{2a} = -tan \frac{x}{2a}

c) This is where I'm stuck, Snell's law is given in the earlier section. I can foresee the need to go to infinitesimal levels as the index of refraction changes over the minute values of y through the trajectory but I cannot see how to begin this task.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
darkfall13 said:
b) It hinted at what to do by stating the slope of the curve which is the derivative of the trajectory.

\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{d}{dx} a \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{x}{2a} \right)^2 \right]
= a \left[ -2 \left( \frac{x}{2a} \right) \left( \frac{1}{2a} \right) \right] = \frac{-x}{2a}

The slope is thought of as "rise over run" so if we're looking for the angle with respect to the y-axis the triangle formed from the tangential to the trajectory and the y-axis the sides of the triangle given from the slope is adjacent and opposite.

cot \theta = \frac{-x}{2a}

Good...

\theta \left( y \right) = tan \frac{-x}{2a} = -tan \frac{x}{2a}

Huh?:confused: First,The cotangent is defined as the reciprocal of the tangent (multiplicative inverse), not its functional inverse. Second, you are supposed to express \theta as a function of y, not x.
 
Ha thank you for the catch, I haven't been completely here lately.

\cot \theta = \frac{-x}{2a}

\theta \left( \textbf{x} \right) = \cot^{-1} \left( \frac{-x}{2a} \right)

= \cot^{-1} \left( - \frac{2a \sqrt{1-\frac{y}{a} } }{2a} \right) = - \cot^{-1} \left( \sqrt{1-y/a} \right) = \theta \left( y \right)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top