Refraction through Muliple media

  • Thread starter Thread starter sr_philosophy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Refraction
AI Thread Summary
A ray of light traveling from air into two different media and back to air undergoes refraction at each interface, with the initial incident angle 'i' being crucial. Snell's law applies at each boundary, allowing for the calculation of angles as the light transitions between media. The discussion emphasizes that the emergent angle from medium 2 back to air is also 'i', which can be derived by applying Snell's law three times. The conversation also touches on the geometry of parallel surfaces and the congruence of alternate-interior angles. Overall, the key takeaway is that Snell's law governs the behavior of light across multiple media interfaces.
sr_philosophy
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Consider a ray of light in air traveling towards a medium 1 and then subsequently to a medium 2 and then back to air again undergoes refraction at every pair of media. Let us say that the initial incident angle between air and medium 1 is 'i'. What law states that the emergent ray at then end from medium 2 to air is also 'i'?
 
Science news on Phys.org
sr_philosophy said:
Consider a ray of light in air traveling towards a medium 1 and then subsequently to a medium 2 and then back to air again undergoes refraction at every pair of media. Let us say that the initial incident angle between air and medium 1 is 'i'. What law states that the emergent ray at then end from medium 2 to air is also 'i'?

Hi sr_philosophy! :wink:

Hint: if the refractive index between air and medium 1 is n1, and between air and medium 2 is n2, what is the refractive index between medium 1 and medium 2? :smile:
 
That's only true for planar interfaces- otherwise, lenses would have no optical power.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi sr_philosophy! :wink:

Hint: if the refractive index between air and medium 1 is n1, and between air and medium 2 is n2, what is the refractive index between medium 1 and medium 2? :smile:

no no! if u look back at the history, the formula was derived after they knew that the angles were equal. That is not a hint. Sorry.
 
sr_philosophy said:
no no! if u look back at the history, the formula was derived after they knew that the angles were equal. That is not a hint. Sorry.
Really? How do you know that if you don't know what the formula is? Could you provide a reference?

In any case, the result you require (as well as the more general Snell's law which tim referenced) follows quite trivially from applying the appropriate boundary conditions to Maxwell's equations.
 
Who told you i didn't know the formula? its not enough if you just know the formula... snell's law applies only for a pair of media... if you didn't know!
 
sr_philosophy said:
Who told you i didn't know the formula?
Er...you did:
sr_philosophy said:
What law states that the emergent ray at then end from medium 2 to air is also 'i'?
sr_philosophy said:
snell's law applies only for a pair of media... if you didn't know!
Indeed it does, but as tiny-tim said, you can apply Snell's law here by first applying it when the ray enters medium 2 from medium 1 and then applying it again as the ray leaves medium 2 and enters medium 1.
 
no! i wish i had a figure to explain things better!
 
sr_philosophy said:
no! i wish i had a figure to explain things better!
Sorry, I misread your OP. So, you have a ray of light traveling through air, which then enters medium 1, subsequently entering medium 2 and then exiting medium 2 back into the air, yes?

If this is the case, then Snell's law is still applicable, you simply have to apply it three times, once at each interface.
 
  • #10
sr_philosophy, are these parallel plane surfaces?

If so, then:

nair sin(θinitial) = n1 sin(θ1)

n1 sin(θ1) = n2 sin(θ2)

n2 sin(θ2) = nair sin(θfinal)

These 3 Snell's Law equations can be combined to show that

θinitial = θfinal

So the answer is Snell's law, plus the geometry theorem (or postulate?) that alternate-interior angles are congruent for a pair of parallel lines cut by a transversal.

Or did I misunderstand what you're describing?
 
Back
Top