Refractive index question - light beam around the world

jadejones
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The refractive index of the Earth’s atmosphere is
n = 1.01 + α(R − r),
where α is a constant, r is the radial distance from the Earth’s centre and
R = 6.4 × 10^6 m is the Earth’s radius. By considering a path comprising a series of
total internal reflections or otherwise, find a value of α for which a light ray emitted
horizontally close to the Earth’s surface would go around the Earth. (The effects of
absorption may be ignored and the Earth may be taken to be a perfect sphere of radius
R.)



2. Homework Equations
n1sin(x1)=n2sin(x2)

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I really have no idea what to do as I understand the refractive index is constantly changing?
Don't know where to start, any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of a wavefront launched horizontally. Realize that the top of this wavefront will move faster than the bottom, since n is lower at higher altitudes ... yet the wavefront phasing across its front has to be the same for all heights - whar does that requirement impose on grad(n)?
 
rude man said:
Think of a wavefront launched horizontally. Realize that the top of this wavefront will move faster than the bottom, since n is lower at higher altitudes ... yet the wavefront phasing across its front has to be the same for all heights - whar does that requirement impose on grad(n)?

Thank you very much for your reply, are you suggesting the light curves around the world? I considered this but thought that only really happened at black holes, or have I misunderstood your response?
 
jadejones said:
Thank you very much for your reply, are you suggesting the light curves around the world? I considered this but thought that only really happened at black holes, or have I misunderstood your response?

I never heard of the herm 'light curves around the world' per se but that is what I had in mind. And I know next to zilch about black holes.

Can you go from there?

BTW the problem did not state that it was possible, it just asked what the n gradient had to be were it possible.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top