- #1
transgalactic
- 1,395
- 0
i got a different solution to my problem :
f(x) continues in [a,b] interval,and differentiable (a,b) b>a>0
alpha differs 0
proove that there is b>c>a
in that formula:
http://img392.imageshack.us/my.php?image=81208753je3.gif
solution:
alpha=&
i was told that in this question i don't use "mean theorim"
but the "couchy mean theorim"
[f(b)-f(a)]/[g(b)-g(a)]=f'(c)/g'(c)
F(x)=f(x)/[x^&] G(x)=1/(x^&)
[F(b)-F(a)]/[G(b)-G(a)] = [f(b)/(b^&) - f(a)/(a^&)]/[1/(b^&) - 1/(a^&)] =
= [f(b)*(a^&) - f(a)*( b^&)]/[a^& - b^&]
F'(c) / G'(c)=[f'(c)* (1/c^&) -&*c^(-&-1)*f(c)]/[-&*c^(-&-1)]=
=[&*f(c)-c*f'(c)]/& =f(c) - c*f'(c)/&
my proffesor solved it like this after about 50 minutes when
he tried to use the mean theorim
and then he said that we need to use couchy mean theorim
i don't know how he desided that??
and the second most important problem is picking the variables.
how he picked
F(x)=f(x)/[x^&] G(x)=1/(x^&)
??
what process do i need to do in order to deside
that the way of solving such a problem is picking
F(x)=f(x)/[x^&] G(x)=1/(x^&)
?
f(x) continues in [a,b] interval,and differentiable (a,b) b>a>0
alpha differs 0
proove that there is b>c>a
in that formula:
http://img392.imageshack.us/my.php?image=81208753je3.gif
solution:
alpha=&
i was told that in this question i don't use "mean theorim"
but the "couchy mean theorim"
[f(b)-f(a)]/[g(b)-g(a)]=f'(c)/g'(c)
F(x)=f(x)/[x^&] G(x)=1/(x^&)
[F(b)-F(a)]/[G(b)-G(a)] = [f(b)/(b^&) - f(a)/(a^&)]/[1/(b^&) - 1/(a^&)] =
= [f(b)*(a^&) - f(a)*( b^&)]/[a^& - b^&]
F'(c) / G'(c)=[f'(c)* (1/c^&) -&*c^(-&-1)*f(c)]/[-&*c^(-&-1)]=
=[&*f(c)-c*f'(c)]/& =f(c) - c*f'(c)/&
my proffesor solved it like this after about 50 minutes when
he tried to use the mean theorim
and then he said that we need to use couchy mean theorim
i don't know how he desided that??
and the second most important problem is picking the variables.
how he picked
F(x)=f(x)/[x^&] G(x)=1/(x^&)
??
what process do i need to do in order to deside
that the way of solving such a problem is picking
F(x)=f(x)/[x^&] G(x)=1/(x^&)
?