Relating the CDF to the probability density

bonfire09
Messages
247
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If ##X## is any random variable defined on ##[0,\infty]## with continuous CDF ##F_X(t)##. Prove that ##E(X)=\int_1^\infty (1-F_X(t)) dt##.
.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to go about this. I think double integration can be used to prove it, but I don't want to go down that path. Is there another which I can prove this. Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure about those limits? I don't see how E(X) can be independent of the behaviour of F between 0 and 1.
 
Well it says that ##X## is a random variable with range ##[0, \infty]##.
 
bonfire09 said:

Homework Statement


If ##X## is any random variable defined on ##[0,\infty]## with continuous CDF ##F_X(t)##. Prove that ##E(X)=\int_1^\infty (1-F_X(t)) dt##.
.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to go about this. I think double integration can be used to prove it, but I don't want to go down that path. Is there another which I can prove this. Thanks.

Somebody has asked you to prove a false result. The correct version is
EX = \int_0^{\infty} [1 - F_X(x)] \,dx .

Exactly how you should prove it depends on what you know about Lebesgue-Stieltjes integrals, or whether you even need to use them. The proof is easiest if you assume that ##F_X(\cdot)## is absolutely continuous, in which case there is a density ##f_X(\cdot)## on ##(0,\infty)## giving ##F_X(x) = \int_0^x f_X(t) \, dt## for all ##x > 0##. If ##F_X## is not absolutely continuous, it can be continuous but not have a density function; then the proof is harder.

I suggest you try it first for the case where a density function exists. Think integration by parts.
 
Last edited:
bonfire09 said:

Homework Statement


If ##X## is any random variable defined on ##[0,\infty]## with continuous CDF ##F_X(t)##. Prove that ##E(X)=\int_1^\infty (1-F_X(t)) dt##.
.


haruspex said:
Are you sure about those limits? I don't see how E(X) can be independent of the behaviour of F between 0 and 1.

I agree; it should be E(X) = \int_0^\infty 1 - F_X(t)\,dt.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure how to go about this. I think double integration can be used to prove it, but I don't want to go down that path. Is there another which I can prove this. Thanks.

This is an application of integration by parts. You want to calculate <br /> E(X) = \int_0^\infty xF_X&#039;(x) \,dx. Note that <br /> F_X&#039;(x) = -\frac{d}{dx}(1 - F_X(x)).<br />
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top