Relation between Group velocity and Phase velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between group velocity and phase velocity, emphasizing that both concepts are defined through Fourier transforms. It highlights that group velocity is meaningful only when the wave packet consists of wavenumbers within a narrow range. The equation v_g=dk/dw is derived from the first term of a Taylor expansion, which is crucial for accurate interpretations. Additionally, it points out that many studies misinterpret group velocities, often overlooking this essential detail. Understanding these relationships is vital for accurate wave analysis in physics.
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
Is there any unconventional method to find out the relation between group velocity and phase velocity? know there is a method employing Fourier tarnsforms and another easier method as well
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phase and group velocities only have meaning using a Fourier transform.
w/k and dk/dw are in terms of Fourier variables.
 
one thing to notice is that, for a group velocity to be meaningful, the wave packet has to be merely composed of wavenumber in a narrow range.
 
Fizik said:
one thing to notice is that, for a group velocity to be meaningful, the wave packet has to be merely composed of wavenumber in a narrow range.
That is a very good point. The equation v_g=dk/dw comes from keeping only the first term of a Taylor expansion. Many of the papers claiming funny group velocities for light miss the point you mention.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top