Relation between r ,ω and θ for rotation around fixed axis.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AakashPandita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axis Relation Rotation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the radial distance (r), angular velocity (ω), and angular displacement (θ) for rotation around a fixed axis. Participants explore the mathematical expressions and vector representations involved in this relationship, touching on concepts from rotational dynamics and vector calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the relationship can be expressed as \(\frac{d\textbf{r}}{dt} = \textbf{ω}\) and \(\frac{dθ}{dt} = ω\), questioning the validity of these equations.
  • Others clarify that the angular velocity vector ω is directed along the axis of rotation, leading to the expression \(\left|\frac{d\hat{\textbf{r}}}{dt}\right| = r\frac{dθ}{dt} = rω\).
  • A participant provides a detailed vector representation of motion around the z-axis, expressing the velocity as a combination of radial and tangential components, \(\vec{v} = \dot{r} \hat{r} + r \omega \hat{\theta}\).
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the use of matrices and vectors in the discussion, indicating a lack of understanding of the notation used.
  • A participant challenges the correctness of the original equations, suggesting that the dimensions are incorrect and emphasizing the importance of dimensional analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the correctness of the initial equations and the use of vector notation. There is no consensus on the validity of the proposed relationships or the best approach to represent the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the notation and dimensional analysis, indicating potential limitations in understanding the mathematical framework being discussed. The discussion remains focused on clarifying these aspects without resolving the underlying questions.

AakashPandita
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
relation between r ,ω and θ for rotation around fixed axis.

[tex]\frac{d\textbf {r}}{dt} = \textbf {ω}[/tex]


[tex]\frac{dθ}{dt} = ω[/tex]


[tex]\lvert\frac{d\textbf {r}}{dt}\rvert = \frac{dθ}{dt}[/tex]

bold means vector. Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi AakashPandita! :smile:

(type \left and and \right before two ordinary ||s, and they resize to fit! :wink:)

[tex]\frac{dθ}{dt} = ω = |\textbf{ω}|[/tex]
ω (the angular velocity vector) is along the axis of rotation (ie, out of the page)
[tex]\left|\frac{d\hat{\textbf {r}}}{dt}\right| = r\frac{dθ}{dt} = rω[/tex]
and
[tex]\frac{d\hat{\textbf {r}}}{dt} = rω\hat{\textbf{θ}}[/tex]
where ##\hat{\textbf {r}}## and ##\hat{\textbf {θ}}## are the unit vectors in the radial and tangential directions
 
Let the rotation be around the [itex]z[/itex] axis of a Cartesian coordinate system. Then
[tex]\vec{r}(t)=r(t) \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \cos[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> \sin[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{pmatrix}.[/tex]
This gives
[tex]\vec{v}(t)=\dot{r}(t) = \dot{r}(t) \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \cos[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> \sin[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{pmatrix} + r(t) \dot{\alpha}(t) \begin{pmatrix}<br /> -\sin[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> \cos[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{pmatrix} = \dot{r} \hat{r} + r \omega \hat{\theta}.[/tex]
If the mass is fixed to a circle, then you have [itex]\dot{r}=0[/itex] and you can write
[tex]\vec{v}=\vec{\omega} \times \vec{r} \quad \text{with} \quad \vec{\omega}=\omega \vec{e}_z=\dot{\theta} \vec{e}_z.[/tex]
 
AakashPandita said:
[tex]\frac{d\textbf {r}}{dt} = \textbf {ω}[/tex]


[tex]\frac{dθ}{dt} = ω[/tex]


[tex]\lvert\frac{d\textbf {r}}{dt}\rvert = \frac{dθ}{dt}[/tex]

bold means vector. Is this right?

You should already know that something is not quite right here, because the dimensions are all wrong! Always check that first, because that is your first "line-of-defense"!

Zz.
 
tiny-tim said:
ω (the angular velocity vector) is along the axis of rotation (ie, out of the page)
[tex]\left|\frac{d\hat{\textbf {r}}}{dt}\right| = r\frac{dθ}{dt} = rω[/tex]

how did you get this?
 
vanhees71 said:
Let the rotation be around the [itex]z[/itex] axis of a Cartesian coordinate system. Then
[tex]\vec{r}(t)=r(t) \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \cos[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> \sin[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{pmatrix}.[/tex]
This gives
[tex]\vec{v}(t)=\dot{r}(t) = \dot{r}(t) \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \cos[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> \sin[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{pmatrix} + r(t) \dot{\alpha}(t) \begin{pmatrix}<br /> -\sin[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> \cos[\alpha(t)] \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{pmatrix} = \dot{r} \hat{r} + r \omega \hat{\theta}.[/tex]
If the mass is fixed to a circle, then you have [itex]\dot{r}=0[/itex] and you can write
[tex]\vec{v}=\vec{\omega} \times \vec{r} \quad \text{with} \quad \vec{\omega}=\omega \vec{e}_z=\dot{\theta} \vec{e}_z.[/tex]

i don't understand matrices
 
vanhees71 wasn't using matrices, AakashPandita. He was using vectors.
 
i don't understand those brackets
 
How are you supposed to solve this question without vectors? I guess you just use a different notation than I use. In your original posting you used abstract vectors, but the equations are unfortunately not correct. So I thought, it's best to use components wrt. a Cartesian basis to explicitly calculate the derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K