Relation of Energy Fluxes of Two Objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Airsteve0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Relation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving an approximate expression for the magnitude difference Δm between two objects with energy fluxes f and f + Δf, where Δf is much smaller than f. The main equations considered are Δm = 2.5 * log(f1/f2) and two different arrangements for Δm based on the flux values. The first arrangement expresses Δm in terms of the logarithmic difference of the fluxes, while the second simplifies the expression using the approximation log(1 + Δf/f). The second arrangement is viewed as more accurate due to the small value of Δf relative to f. The conversation seeks clarification on the best approach to take for the problem.
Airsteve0
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose two objects have energy fluxes, f and f + Δf, where
Δf ≪ f. Derive an approximate expression for the magnitude difference
Δm between these objects. Your expression should have Δm
proportional to Δf.


Homework Equations


Δm = m2 - m1 = 2.5 * log(f1/f2)


The Attempt at a Solution


So the issue is that I'm not sure which of these solutions would be the better one to work with. However, I did make an approximation with the one as shown below and I'm not sure if it is quite accurate enough. Any assistance is greatly appreciated.

ARRANGEMENT 1: Δm = 2.5 * log(f / f+Δf) = 2.5 * [ log(f) - log (f + Δf)]

or,

ARRANGEMENT 2: Δm = 2.5 * log(f+Δf / f) = 2.5 * log(1 + Δf/f) ≈ 2.5*Δf

The second arrangement seems more correct to me but I would feel more confident with a second opinion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the reason I have two arrangements is that the question is quite open-ended as to which object has which flux
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top