I Relations & Functions: Types, Examples, Homomorphism

AI Thread Summary
A relation in mathematics is defined as a subset of the Cartesian product between two sets, with types including injective, functional, left total, and surjective. A function is a specific type of relation that is both right unique and left total. The discussion raises questions about the existence of relations that are left total and right total but not functions, particularly in the context of infinite sets. It also explores why relations between group structures often result in functions, or homomorphisms, emphasizing that relations can be arbitrary and numerous. The conclusion highlights the preference for functions in mathematical contexts due to their clear and manageable nature, especially in describing natural phenomena.
mikeeey
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Hello every one .
A relation ( is a subset of the cartesian product between Xand Y) in math between two sets has spatial
types 1-left unique ( injective)
2- right unique ( functional )
3- left total
4- right total (surjective)
May question is 1- a function ( map ) is a relation that is
a- right unique
b- left total
I'm asking if there is a relation ( not function ) that is ( left total) and ( right total ) then what would is be called ? In the sense that the two set are infinite set is there and example
My second question if we have two group structures and we want a relation between them , why does always the relation is function ( homomorphism ) ? Is there a relation that is left total and right total between the two structures ?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Does your x-total imply x-unique? If not, you have pretty many possibilities to define non-functional relations (finite or not).
The same goes for group homomorphisms. Simply define a relation ##R## (functional or not, finite or not) with ##(a,1) \in R## for an ##a \neq 1##, the neutral element.
 
No , there is no uniqueness
A relation which is not function e.g. X^2+Y^2=1 , this is between two sets
Now if a set with a structure ( space ) is there relation( not map ) between the two space or groups ? And how would it look like ?
 
Simply take a projection, e.g. ##ℝ^2 → ℝ## with ##(x,y) = x## and turn the arrow, so ##((x,y),x)## becomes ##(x,(x,y))##.
But this is only one example out of many. Relation means, you are not restricted to any other rule than to draw many arrows, i.e. in case of totality ##R \subseteq X \times Y## such that ##∀ x \in X \; ∀ y \in Y \; ∃ (x,y) \in R##. Relate whatever you want to.
There is a reason why we talk about functions. Relations are simply too many and too arbitrary.
 
Thank you very much , now i understand why we choose functions to relate spaces , and alao i think functions appear in nature of physics a lot ( by means function decribe the nature ) and easy to handle because we know how elements are related .
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top