Relationship between flux, current and voltage

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between flux, current, and voltage in a coil system influenced by a permanent magnet. Participants explore concepts of electromagnetic induction, self-inductance, and the behavior of current and voltage in circuits involving inductors and resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario with a coil and a permanent magnet, noting that as the magnet moves, the flux linkage changes, inducing voltage and resulting in current flow.
  • Another participant challenges the initial equation for current, stating that it does not account for the flux from the permanent magnet, which affects the total flux linkage.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of current lagging voltage in inductors, explaining that this is due to the relationship between flux linkage and the time derivative of current.
  • There is a mention of the power being positive regardless of the signs of voltage and current, as the product of voltage and current remains positive.
  • Confusion arises regarding the phase relationship between current and voltage, particularly in the context of changing external magnetic flux and its impact on the behavior of the circuit.
  • One participant acknowledges their confusion between self-inductance and induced voltage due to external flux changes.
  • Another participant emphasizes that current and voltage are always in phase for resistors, regardless of the source of voltage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between current and voltage in this context, particularly regarding the effects of external flux and self-inductance. There is no consensus on the implications of negative power or the phase relationship in the presence of external magnetic influences.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of inductors and resistors in circuits, as well as the effects of external magnetic fields on flux linkage. Some mathematical relationships and definitions remain unresolved or unclear.

rohitchaky
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Consider the following system - A coil is wrapped around a soft iron core as shown below. A permanent magnet is placed at one end of the coil.
Code:
[FONT="Courier New"]
                          +--+-----+--+
                          |   |        |   |
Coil +ve Side -->   |   |        |   | --> Coil -ve Side
                          |   |        |   |
                          +--+-----+--+

                                            +-----+
                                            |        | --> Permanent Magnet
                                            +-----+

Consider the magnet being moved from right of the screen (initial position) to the left of the screen. As the magnet moves towards the perfect alignment with the core (lets call it center), the flux linkage of the coil increases.
-- Since there is a rate of change of flux linkage, I have voltage induced in the coil
-- Assuming the circuit to be complete, I get a current flowing through the coil whose value is current = flux linkage / coil inductance

As the magnet moves away from the center, the flux linkage decreases. However the magnitude of flux linkage is positive
-- From the previous equation, current is still positive since flux linkage is positive
-- Since the rate of change of flux linkage is negative, voltage polarity is reversed

In the former case if I had assumed the polarity to be +ve, I have a situation where I get -ve voltage and + current

Is this the reason why we say in an inductor current lags the voltage?

If to close the circuit I had a simple resistor then how do I explain the presence of -ve power in this case? I do not know how to account for the negative power. Can someone please explain this to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your equation for current is not correct in this case. For the total flux linkage to be proportional to the coil current, there would have to be no other source of flux besides the coil current. In this case, the flux through the coil would be the sum of the flux from the coil current and the flux from the permanent magnet.

Current lags (sinusoidal) voltage for an uncoupled inductor because the flux linkage is proportional to the inductor current, the voltage is proportional to the time derivative of flux linkage (thus proprotional to the time derivative of inductor current), and the time derivative of a sine wave is that sine wave shifted in the -t direction by pi/2 radians.
 
Last edited:
Could you be confusing the effect of self inductance for a coil and the voltage induced in an inductor due to a changing external magnetic flux? The current through your load resistor (R) would just be Vi/R. (where Vi is the induced voltage in the coil) The power would be Vi2/R, which would, of course, always be positive.
The value of Vi would depend on dφ/dt, which will be positive - then negative, as you say.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Could you be confusing the effect of self inductance for a coil and the voltage induced in an inductor due to a changing external magnetic flux? The current through your load resistor (R) would just be Vi/R. (where Vi is the induced voltage in the coil) The power would be Vi2/R, which would, of course, always be positive.
The value of Vi would depend on dφ/dt, which will be positive - then negative, as you say.

Yes I was confusing myself with the two. But even in this case, until the direction of current changes, isn't there a -ve power?
 
MisterX said:
Your equation for current is not correct in this case. For the total flux linkage to be proportional to the coil current, there would have to be no other source of flux besides the coil current. In this case, the flux through the coil would be the sum of the flux from the coil current and the flux from the permanent magnet.

Current lags (sinusoidal) voltage for an uncoupled inductor because the flux linkage is proportional to the inductor current, the voltage is proportional to the time derivative of flux linkage (thus proprotional to the time derivative of inductor current), and the time derivative of a sine wave is that sine wave shifted in the -t direction by pi/2 radians.

So since this is an uncoupled inductor, current lags correct?

Thanks for the info regarding relationship between flux and current.
 
To start, there's +V and +I then there's -V and -I. In both cases the product will be positive. ( in the same way that vsquared is always positive.

The current through the resistor has to be in phase with the volts across it. How. Would it 'know' where the volts were coming from at any time? This can be confusing, I know.
 
rohitchaky said:
So since this is an uncoupled inductor, current lags correct?

Not neccessarily, because of the changing component of flux linkage from another source. I could have made that more clear. For the hypothetical situation you described, the total flux linkage is not proportional to the current, so the reasoning I supplied for why current lags voltage for an uncoupled inductor is not valid.

And, as sophiecentaur has posted, current and voltage will always be in phase for a resistor in circuit theory.
 
thanks MisterX and sophiecentaur
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
64
Views
8K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K