Relationship between k and E when deriving the density of states

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between wave vector k and energy E in deriving the density of states. It establishes that the number of states in k-space, given by n(k)dk, can be expressed as n(E)dE due to the transformation between k and E. A point of confusion arises regarding the assumption that each k state corresponds to two energy states, particularly considering polarization directions. Clarification is sought on why the number of energy states matches the number of k states despite this apparent discrepancy. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the derivation of Planck's law.
TIF141
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I'm trying to work through the derivation of the density of states function in a Fermi sphere. I understand the derivation except for one part when n(k)dk changes to n(E)dE with the only explanation being "by definition".
Relevant Equations
Volume of k-space per electron energy state = ##\frac{L^3}{4 \pi^3}##
Hence energy states per unit volume is ##\frac{4 \pi^3}{L^3}##
Volume of k-space between spheres of radius ##k## and ##k + dk## is ##4 \pi k^2 dk##.
Number of states in that volume of k-space, ##n(k)dk## is: $$n(k)dk = (\frac{L^3}{4 \pi^3}) \cdot 4 \pi k^2 dk = \frac{L^3}{\pi^2}dk$$.
Then the notes state that by defintion, ##n(k)dk = n(E)dE##, and hence $$n(E)d(E) = \frac{L^3}{\pi^2}dk$$.

I don't quite see why this is true - isn't it the case that each coordinate in k-space has 2 energy states associated with it? Then how is the number of energy states in that volume that same as the number of k states? If someone can clear up my confusion that would be great, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top