Relationship between size and frequency of an oscillator

AI Thread Summary
As mechanical systems scale down, both frequency and Q factor tend to increase, a relationship supported by the behavior of small bells. For driven damped harmonic oscillators, the resonant frequency is influenced by the mass-spring-damper model, where frequency scales with size according to the formula f_0 ∝ T/L^2 √(E/ρ). This equation incorporates material properties like Young's modulus and density, indicating that as the resonator's mass decreases or stiffness increases, frequency rises. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how parameters like mass, damping, and stiffness change with size in MEMS oscillators. Ultimately, the scaling laws for these systems are complex but can be simplified with appropriate assumptions regarding material properties and geometry.
CraigH
Messages
221
Reaction score
1
I've always just accepted that as you scale down a mechanical system the frequency and Q factor both increase. For example, this Wikipedia page simply says that "Small bells ring at higher frequencies than large bells".

But for a driven damped harmonic oscillator, what is the exact relationship between size, resonant frequency, and Q factor?

http://www.ieee-uffc.org/frequency-control/learning/pdf/Kaajakari-MEMS_Resonators_v2b.pdf states that a tuning fork scales:

##\omega_r \propto \frac{1}{size}##

But how about a mass-spring-damper? Will this also scale the same as the tuning fork?

I'm trying to find out how the frequency and Q factor scale as you scale down MEMS oscillators, and the PDF above states that a MEMS oscillator can be modeled as a mass-spring-damper.

##m \ddot{x} + c \dot{x} + kx = F_{input}##

If the oscillator can be modeled as above, can we use the same scaling law as the tuning fork? If we can, how can this be proved mathematically? If not, how will it scale? I'm guessing it all depends on how ##m##, ##c##, and ##k## scale with size. If this is complex, what is a fair assumption to simplify the problem? If the maths is still too complex, are there any rules of thumb of how mass-spring-damper frequency scales with size? Is there anything I need to watch out for as the MEMS resonator can be scaled down to micro and nano scale sizes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've almost found the answer. http://www.ieee-uffc.org/frequency-control/learning/pdf/Piazza-MEMS_Resonators_for_Frequency_v1.pdf says the answer is:

##f_0 \propto \frac{T}{L^2} \sqrt{\frac{E}{\rho}}##

I now just need to know what the symbols are. Any ideas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
from normal bell, frequency tuner, and other oscillations it is all f = sqrt (k/m), as the resonator mass decreases for a constant stiffness the frequency increases. or as stiffness increases the frequency increases.

the equation above takes into account the geometry and young's modulus of the material - I think its material flexural vibration modes. take beam of material and you trying to calculate the stiffness and mass. the not an equals sign is to indicate that there a multiple modes possible.
so basically a L length of beam, with a E young's modulus and a density rho, T is the beam's thickness.
the first mode is going to be the greatest usually and the lowest frequency - simple bending.
 
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top