Relationship between Temperature & Half-Life

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between temperature and the half-life of radioactive decay for element X in varying thermal environments. Participants argue that temperature primarily affects atomic motion, while radioactive decay is governed by nuclear forces, suggesting that half-life remains largely unchanged across different temperatures. However, some posit that extreme conditions, such as absolute zero or high temperatures, could influence decay rates, albeit minutely. The conversation also touches on the effects of temperature on atomic and nucleonic states, with a consensus that while atomic activity may be affected, the fundamental processes of radioactive decay are not significantly altered. Ultimately, the nuances of temperature's impact on half-life remain a complex topic requiring further exploration.
Ace Nova
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have a radioactive element X in a closed environment, if we were to measure the half-life of element X's radioactive decay at:

1) Near absolute zero
2) At room temperature
3) At 1000s of degrees Kelvin

Would there be a change in element X's half-life even if it is minute? And if so which way would it change in relationship to temperature.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I suspect there is no change due to temperature. Temperature is a measure of atomic motion, while radioactivity depends on forces inside the nucleus itself.
 
Consider it this way, (probably should have worded this with more SR), I know that Temperature is a measure of Atomic motion. In a higher temperature sample of the same material, atoms are moving around faster than those in a colder one.

Much like we can basically ignore relativity at small velocities and just use Newtonian physics, there is still relativistic effects although they are minute. Couldnt relativity's minute effects change the half life minutely as the average velocity of the atoms increase as temperature increase.
 
This is a great question!
My thoughts: Since the "event" of radioactive decay is directly and immutably associated with changes in nucleonic states and, since, these changes are directly affected by temperature, it seems reasonable that the rate of radioactive decay is lessened in colder environments.
I would be willing to posit that a gram of plutonium would have zero radioactivity in a zero-degree's Kelvin environment.
 
mmwave, thanks for the correction on my post. I was obviously under an erroneous assumption that zero-degrees Kelvin halted ALL atomic activity.
So a proton, for instance, would not break down into its associated quarks in a zero-degree Kelvin environment, if I am understanding this correctly. So, as you said, nucleonic states are not affected.
If I am getting all this, would it be fair to suggest that a zero-degrees Kelvin environment affects electrons ONLY; for example, co-valent boding is no longer possible, the material easily disintegrates, but the individual atoms remain intact, including any radioactive events?
Good lesson for me. Thanks.
 
If the temperature of the radionuclide were high enough that it became fully ionised, and then even higher so that significant numbers of nuclear reactions were to take place, then the 'half-life' would be different. But then you'd have taken the poor old atom way beyond the regime in which 'half-life' is defined.

Ditto re pressure - when crushed to white dwarf densities, the 'half-life' will surely be different. :wink:
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top