Relationship between Temperature & Half-Life

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between temperature and the half-life of radioactive decay for element X in varying thermal environments. Participants argue that temperature primarily affects atomic motion, while radioactive decay is governed by nuclear forces, suggesting that half-life remains largely unchanged across different temperatures. However, some posit that extreme conditions, such as absolute zero or high temperatures, could influence decay rates, albeit minutely. The conversation also touches on the effects of temperature on atomic and nucleonic states, with a consensus that while atomic activity may be affected, the fundamental processes of radioactive decay are not significantly altered. Ultimately, the nuances of temperature's impact on half-life remain a complex topic requiring further exploration.
Ace Nova
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Lets say we have a radioactive element X in a closed environment, if we were to measure the half-life of element X's radioactive decay at:

1) Near absolute zero
2) At room temperature
3) At 1000s of degrees Kelvin

Would there be a change in element X's half-life even if it is minute? And if so which way would it change in relationship to temperature.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I suspect there is no change due to temperature. Temperature is a measure of atomic motion, while radioactivity depends on forces inside the nucleus itself.
 
Consider it this way, (probably should have worded this with more SR), I know that Temperature is a measure of Atomic motion. In a higher temperature sample of the same material, atoms are moving around faster than those in a colder one.

Much like we can basically ignore relativity at small velocities and just use Newtonian physics, there is still relativistic effects although they are minute. Couldnt relativity's minute effects change the half life minutely as the average velocity of the atoms increase as temperature increase.
 
This is a great question!
My thoughts: Since the "event" of radioactive decay is directly and immutably associated with changes in nucleonic states and, since, these changes are directly affected by temperature, it seems reasonable that the rate of radioactive decay is lessened in colder environments.
I would be willing to posit that a gram of plutonium would have zero radioactivity in a zero-degree's Kelvin environment.
 
mmwave, thanks for the correction on my post. I was obviously under an erroneous assumption that zero-degrees Kelvin halted ALL atomic activity.
So a proton, for instance, would not break down into its associated quarks in a zero-degree Kelvin environment, if I am understanding this correctly. So, as you said, nucleonic states are not affected.
If I am getting all this, would it be fair to suggest that a zero-degrees Kelvin environment affects electrons ONLY; for example, co-valent boding is no longer possible, the material easily disintegrates, but the individual atoms remain intact, including any radioactive events?
Good lesson for me. Thanks.
 
If the temperature of the radionuclide were high enough that it became fully ionised, and then even higher so that significant numbers of nuclear reactions were to take place, then the 'half-life' would be different. But then you'd have taken the poor old atom way beyond the regime in which 'half-life' is defined.

Ditto re pressure - when crushed to white dwarf densities, the 'half-life' will surely be different. :wink:
 
Back
Top