Relationship of particle charge to speed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between particle charge and speed when released from a positively charged rod. A charged particle with a mass of 3.0 x 10^-8 kg and a charge of 2 microcoulombs is observed to reach a speed of 40 m/s at point X. The question arises about the speed of a second particle with the same mass but nine times the charge when released from the same point. Initially, it is suggested that the speed would be equal due to the mass being constant, but further analysis indicates that as charge increases, the change in potential energy also increases, leading to a decrease in kinetic energy. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the speed of the second particle will be less than that of the first as it passes point X.
temptasian
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The four points shown in the attached picture are near a positively charged rod (shaded circle). Points W and Y are equidistant from the rod, as are points X and Z. A charged particle with mass 3.0 x 10^-8 kg is released from rest at point W and later observed to pass point X.
Suppose the magnitude of the charge is 2 microcoloumbs and that the speed of the particle is 40 m/s as it passes point X. Suppose that a second particle with the same mass as the first but NINE times the CHARGE were released from rest at point W. Would the speed of the second particle as it passes point X be greater than, less than, or equal to the speed of the first particle (with charge of 2 microcoulombs) as it passes point X?


Homework Equations


From KE = 1/2 (mv^2), I know that charge is not involved here, and since mass is the same, I believe the speed of the second particle is equal to the speed of the first particle.
However, I'm not sure if I should be using this equation to make a relationship between speed and charge. Other possible equations to use may be: U(potential energy) = qV, and W = -qEd = ΔU
Am I on the right track?

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 498
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, you need to use the 'other possible equations'. You've got ΔU=qΔV This is the change in potential energy, so what will be the change in kinetic energy? Also, is ΔV the same or different in the two situations?
 
ΔV is constant for both situations. So if I use ΔU = qΔV, when charge increases, ΔU has to increase also, which means kinetic energy has decreased. Since KE has decreased, and we know that KE = 1/2 mv^2, the speed of the second particle will be less than the speed of the second particle. I hope I'm correct here?
 
Yes, the ΔV is the same in both situations.
temptasian said:
So if I use ΔU = qΔV, when charge increases, ΔU has to increase also, which means kinetic energy has decreased. Since KE has decreased, and we know that KE = 1/2 mv^2, the speed of the second particle will be less than the speed of the second particle.
But this isn't right. Think about the sign of ΔU. The particle is being pushed away from the rod, so how does the potential change when the particle moves away from the rod?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top