Relative Acceleration in Noninertial Reference Frames

AI Thread Summary
In a non-inertial reference frame, such as a spaceship accelerating upwards, the perceived acceleration of a block on a frictionless incline changes. While the astronaut initially observes the block sliding down with acceleration Mgsinθ, the upward acceleration of the spaceship alters this perception. The astronaut cannot distinguish between the effects of gravity and the spaceship's acceleration through experiments conducted within the spaceship. Consequently, the effective acceleration of the block relative to the astronaut will differ from Mgsinθ due to the influence of the spaceship's upward acceleration. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing motion in non-inertial frames.
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Suppose you have a spaceship and in the spaceship is a block on an frictionless incline. Initially, the spaceship is at rest on the Earth's surface. The astronaut in the spaceship observes the block sliding down the incline with acceleration Mgsinθ.

Now consider that the spaceship is accelerating upwards with an acceleration of A. What will be the acceleration of the block relative to the astronaut in this situation? (assume gravity is still equal to g)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


My answer:
Even though the spaceship is accelerating upwards, the astronaut has no way of detecting whether or not the spaceship is accelerating through experiments on the block. Thus, the acceleration measred by the astronaut must be the same as before, i.e. Mgsinθ. If this were not the case, the astronaut could conclude that the spaceship is accelerating in some direction, but that is impossible from experiments done only within the spaceship.

Could someone confirm my answer. Thanks.

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not right. It looks like you have tried to use the equivalence principle. I am guessing you have been learning about how a man in an elevator cannot tell whether the elevator is accelerated upwards with zero gravity, or whether the elevator is stationary, and there is a gravitational field downward.

The important thing to remember from this is that we are swapping between non-inertial reference frames, so this means that 'gravity' is going to be different, as perceived by those different frames.

You have two situations: 1) spaceship 'at rest' on the Earth's surface. 2) spaceship accelerating with respect to the earth. Now, using the example of the man in the elevator, what will happen to the block?
 
The astronaut cannot feel gravity itself, but it can feel the thrust required to accelerate the spaceship - and this depends on gravity, as you fix the acceleration relative to the surface of earth.
On the ground, the spaceship does not feel gravity itself either - it feels the force from the ground, keeping the spaceship at rest relative to the surface. If the spaceship uses its engines, you just increase that force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top