Relative Time Question: Train Experiment and Conflicting Views

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex48674
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative Time
Alex48674
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Imagine the following scenario.

There is a long train moving at very fast speeds (approaching light speeds), one man stands at the back of the train with a watch and another at the front. A third man stands exactly halfway between them with some gunpowder and a match. The men at the back agree to set their watches to 1 o clock when the light from the gunpowder reaches them (I said fast and long train so that it will actually take a reasonable time to reach them). A forth man watches from outside the ground.

The gunpowder goes off, and both men set their watches. The third man views this and says it was a fair timing and both had set their watches to the same time. However the man from the ground sees the light reach the man at the back of the train 2 seconds earlier (since relative to him the man at the back is moving towards the light and man at the front away). So he thinks the clocks are set to 1:00 and 1:02.

The train slows down and the man from the ground goes and sees the watches. What will they say?

I'm having a bit of trouble coming up with an answer for this because I know both views are both equally valid views, but the clocks can only say one thing when they all look at it togeather.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alex! :smile:

It's easier if you consider what happens if the back man (after they've set their watches) walks slowly towards the front man.

The observer on the ground will gradually see the times on the watches get closer.

Similarly, if the train gradually slows down, but the two men stay apart, the observer on the ground will gradually see the times on the watches get closer. :smile:
 
Ah ok I see thanks.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
136
Views
14K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top