Relative Time Question: Train Experiment and Conflicting Views

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex48674
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative Time
Alex48674
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Imagine the following scenario.

There is a long train moving at very fast speeds (approaching light speeds), one man stands at the back of the train with a watch and another at the front. A third man stands exactly halfway between them with some gunpowder and a match. The men at the back agree to set their watches to 1 o clock when the light from the gunpowder reaches them (I said fast and long train so that it will actually take a reasonable time to reach them). A forth man watches from outside the ground.

The gunpowder goes off, and both men set their watches. The third man views this and says it was a fair timing and both had set their watches to the same time. However the man from the ground sees the light reach the man at the back of the train 2 seconds earlier (since relative to him the man at the back is moving towards the light and man at the front away). So he thinks the clocks are set to 1:00 and 1:02.

The train slows down and the man from the ground goes and sees the watches. What will they say?

I'm having a bit of trouble coming up with an answer for this because I know both views are both equally valid views, but the clocks can only say one thing when they all look at it togeather.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alex! :smile:

It's easier if you consider what happens if the back man (after they've set their watches) walks slowly towards the front man.

The observer on the ground will gradually see the times on the watches get closer.

Similarly, if the train gradually slows down, but the two men stay apart, the observer on the ground will gradually see the times on the watches get closer. :smile:
 
Ah ok I see thanks.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
136
Views
14K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top