Relative Velocity of an escalator

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves a student running against the direction of a 30.0 m escalator moving at 1.8 m/s. To beat the local record time of 11 seconds, the student must achieve a speed greater than 0.93 m/s relative to the escalator. The calculations show that the student's speed relative to the ground is approximately 2.73 m/s. The approach using relative velocities is confirmed to be correct. Feedback on the solution indicates that the method is sound.
UMich1344
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The escalator that leads down into a subway station has a length of 30.0 m and a speed of 1.8 m/s relative to the ground. A student is coming out of the station by running in the wrong direction on this escalator. The local record time for this trick is 11 s. Relative to the escalator, what speed must the student exceed in order to beat the record?

Homework Equations



Addition/subtraction of relative velocities.

The Attempt at a Solution



The velocity of the Student relative to the Ground is equal to the length of the escalator divided by the time it takes to travel the length of the escalator. In this scenario, the time will be the local record time as given.

We know from the given information that x = +30.0 m and t = 11 s.

\vec{v}SG = velocity of the Student relative to the Ground = \frac{x}{t} = \frac{+30.0}{11} = +2.727272727 m/s
\vec{v}SE = velocity of the Student relative to the Escalator
\vec{v}EG = velocity of the Escalator relative to the Ground = +1.8 m/s

\vec{v}SG = \vec{v}SE + \vec{v}EG

\vec{v}SE = \vec{v}SG - \vec{v}EG
\vec{v}SE = (+2.727272727 m/s) - (+1.8 m/s)
\vec{v}SE = 0.92727273 m/s

Relative to the escalator, the student must exceed a speed of 0.93 m/s [to the correct number of significant figures (2)].

Question

I feel pretty confident that I've approached this one the right way. Could someone please take the time to look it over and give me some feedback? Thank you... I really appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks ok.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top