Relativistic Energy: Calculate Decay Product Kinetic Energy

Aeighme
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A radium isotope decays to a radon isotope by emitting an α particle (a helium nucleus) according to the decay scheme 226Ra --> 222Rn + 4He. The masses of the atoms are 226.0254 u (226Ra), 222.0176 u (222Rn), and 4.0026 u (4He). What is the total kinetic energy of the decay products (in MeV)?

Homework Equations


E0=mc2
E=gamma*mc2
K=gamma*mc2-mc2
E=K+E0
1u=931.494 (MeV)/c2

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know what to do for this...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help!
This concept is confusing for me and once I understand this, it will make the rest of my problems much easier to solve.
 
well...how much more massive is the input (radium), than the output (Radon and a Helium nucleus)...I'm not sure if you are confused by the notation, the 4He should be one helium nucleus with 4 nucleons.

~Lyuokdea
 
Aeighme said:
Please help!
This concept is confusing for me and once I understand this, it will make the rest of my problems much easier to solve.

calm down, wait more than 13minutes before bumping thread :-)
 
<< complete solution deleted by berkeman >>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top