Relativistic Energy of a Ball: Understanding the Equivalence of Mass and Energy

astro2cosmos
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
according to mass-energy equivalent theorem, Regardless of whether the object is at rest or moving, the object of mass m having energy E=mc2.

suppose a ball of mass m is placed on ground, then how much energy this ball have?
Is it equal to E=mc2 ??
now if we place this ball above the ground up to height h, Is this mean all Energy of ball (i.e E=mc2) is converted to potential energy (mgh) ?
if so this ball have so much tremendous energy!
how it can be possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
astro2cosmos said:
according to mass-energy equivalent theorem, Regardless of whether the object is at rest or moving, the object of mass m having energy E=mc2.

suppose a ball of mass m is placed on ground, then how much energy this ball have?
Is it equal to E=mc2 ??
now if we place this ball above the ground up to height h, Is this mean all Energy of ball (i.e E=mc2) is converted to potential energy (mgh) ?
if so this ball have so much tremendous energy!
how it can be possible?

If the ball went up to h all by itself, then yes. Usually ball's don't do that, and the rest energy of a small fraction of its mass would usually blast the ball well above escape velocity if it did.

Usually the energy to raise the ball h is added by some other force, thus the rest energy of the ball is constant.
 
astro2cosmos said:
according to mass-energy equivalent theorem, Regardless of whether the object is at rest or moving, the object of mass m having energy E=mc2.

suppose a ball of mass m is placed on ground, then how much energy this ball have?
Is it equal to E=mc2 ??
now if we place this ball above the ground up to height h, Is this mean all Energy of ball (i.e E=mc2) is converted to potential energy (mgh) ?

No, it isn't. But , if the ball is made out of a radioactive material and you let it sit on your desk, it will release an energy:

\Delta E=c^2 \Delta m

Now, this can be a tremendous amount of energy due to the huge value of the conversion factor c^2


if so this ball have so much tremendous energy!
how it can be possible?

If it is radioactive, this is how it is possible. Be careful when you play with radioactive tennis balls :-)
 
astro2cosmos said:
Energy of ball (i.e E=mc2) is converted to potential energy (mgh) ?

mc<sup>2</sup> is descriptive of the isolated ball. mgh is an energy of the ball/earth system. Unfortunately, this potential energy is often said to be part of the ball's energy (e.g. in quantum theory).
 
GRDixon said:
mc<sup>2</sup> is descriptive of the isolated ball. mgh is an energy of the ball/earth system. Unfortunately, this potential energy is often said to be part of the ball's energy (e.g. in quantum theory).

what is the "descriptive of the isolated ball"?? then does the total energy of the ball contain both quantities i.e (T.E = mc2 + mgh)??
but in this case the quantitative value of mgh is very much higher than the mc2 in terms of Joule.!
wat is confusion!
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top