Solving Relativistic Momentum Problem: Pion Decays into Photons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a relativistic momentum problem involving a pion decaying into two photons at an angle. The pion has a velocity of 2.977 x 10^8 m/s and a mass of 135 MeV. The user struggles with deriving the correct angle for the photons, which should be 6.79 degrees, but their calculations yield an incorrect result. They express frustration over the complexity of their approach compared to the simpler method presented in the textbook. The conversation highlights the importance of finding efficient solutions in physics for better retention during tests.
mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with getting the right answer for this problem that is pretty simple and it is driving me insane.

You start out with a pion that decays into 2 photons that split at an angle theta in opposite directions from the original pion.

The velocity v of the pion is 2.977*10^8 m/s, with a mass m of 135 MeV.

If E is the pions energy and E1 and E2 are the photons energy then we have:
<br /> E=E1+E2=\gamma*m*v<br />
With E1=E1/c, E2=E2/c

and so for momentum we have(P1-P2)Sin[\theta]=0 so we get P1=P2 so E1=E2

So we can write 2(P1+P2)Cos[\theta]=Ppion

Now we can write 2E/C*Cos[\theta]=\gamma*m*v

Which reduces to Cos[\theta]=\gamma*m*v*c/2E but this does not give me the correct angle :( The correct angle should be 6.79 degrees for each photon but as you can see from my equation since v=2.977 I get Cos[\theta]=1/2(about), can anyone find my problem before I go insane? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
E=m\gamma, not mv\gamma.
Just write p/E=v/c=(2k\cos\theta)/(2k).
 
Thanks, the book does it similar to how you solve it, but I like to be able to solve things in a way that I will remember on a test just in case I can't find the easy way. Thanks, I figured it was something stupid like that.
 
Last edited:
The easy way is easier to remember. Physics is finding the easy way.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top