Relativistic motion in a particle accelerator: Rate of Energy Loss

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the rate of energy loss due to radiation for a 10-MeV proton and an electron in a cyclotron with a radius of 0.5m. The formula used for the proton is P = (2kq²a²)/(3c³), yielding a result of approximately 5.21 x 10-4 eV/s, which aligns closely with the book's answer of 5.23 x 10-4 eV/s. For the electron, the modified formula P = (2kq²a²γ⁴)/(3c³) was applied, but the user encountered an issue with obtaining an imaginary number for velocity, indicating a misunderstanding of relativistic motion. The correct approach involves using the kinetic energy equation to determine γ before calculating the velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic motion and the Lorentz factor (γ).
  • Familiarity with the kinetic energy formula and its application in particle physics.
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic radiation and its relation to charged particles.
  • Proficiency in unit conversions, particularly between Joules and electronvolts (eV).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lorentz factor (γ) in relativistic physics.
  • Learn about the principles of radiation loss in particle accelerators, specifically for charged particles.
  • Explore the differences in energy loss calculations between protons and electrons in circular motion.
  • Investigate advanced topics in particle physics, such as synchrotron radiation and its effects on high-energy particles.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and engineers working in accelerator technology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the calculations of energy loss in relativistic contexts.

JackFlash
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(a) Consider a 10-Mev proton in a cyclotron of radius .5m. Use the formula (F1) to calculate the rate of energy loss in eV/s due to radiation.
(b) Suppose that we tried to produce electrons with the same kinetic energy in a circular machine of the same radius. In this case the motion would be relativistic and formula (F1) is modified by an extra factor of \gamma^{4}. Find the rate of energy loss of the electron and com¬pare with that for a proton.

Homework Equations


(F1):
P = \frac{2kq^{2}a^{2}}{3c^{3}}

(F1): (modified to have the "extra factor")
P = \frac{2kq^{2}a^{2}\gamma^{4}}{3c^{3}}

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}

a = \frac{v^{2}}{r}

KE = .5mv^{2}


The Attempt at a Solution


I did part (a) as best I could. I set kq^{2} = (2.307•10^{28} J•m), solved for v by using the Kinetic Energy formula and converting the 10-MeV value into Joules, doubling it, divide by the proton's mass, and take the square root (my velocity was 43738998.62 m/s). Plug it all into the equation, the answer comes out in J/s. Convert to eV/s and I get 5.21^{-4} eV/s. The book's answer is P = 5.23^{-4} eV/s. I disregarded the small error as due to rounding numbers throughout the equation.

Part (b) is what's grinding my gears. I do the same thing I did to get v as before. 10-MeV into Joules, double, divide by the electron's mass, and square root:

v = \sqrt{\frac{2(1.6•10^{-12}J)}{9.11•10^{-31}kg}}

I get 1.874•10^{9} m/s. That isn't possible at all. But I run with it, solve for gamma (I got an imaginary number given that v was bigger than c), then solve the equation, convert the answer from J/s to eV/s and I get 1.2eV/s. The answer should be 2.05•10^{5}eV/s. The equation I'm plugging all my numbers into looks like this:

P = \frac{2kq^{2}v^{4}\gamma^{4}}{3c^{3}r^{2}}

I understand it may appear that I only tried once, and in laziness decided to post the question on here, but I assure you all that I have tried the problem many times. I'm sure the velocity is wrong, but I don't know how it is wrong. Any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For relativistic motion, the energy is

E = \gamma m c^2,

so the kinetic energy is

T = \gamma m c^2 - mc^2.

The fact you found v>c was a hint that you were using an invalid nonrelativistic expression. As an aside, the equation above let's you determine \gamma directly.
 
Mother of mercy, that's it! Solving for Kinetic Energy to get gamma, then solving for v using the equation I got, then plugging it all into the last equation got me my answer. It also helped me out on the two questions after the one I posted, where my velocities were all just a hair below the speed of light.
Thank you very much. I recognized the equations you posted and was able to get the answers right away. Perhaps I should pay better attention to my textbook, huh?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K