Relativistic Particle Decay: Strong, EM, Weak, or Gravitational Interactions?

AI Thread Summary
A relativistic particle traveling 3*10^-3 m before decaying raises questions about the dominant interaction type. Initial calculations suggest a timescale of 10^-11 seconds, indicating weak interactions. However, the text claims strong interactions dominate the decay process. The discussion highlights the importance of considering time dilation effects, as the particle's speed relative to light can significantly alter the observed decay time. More information about the particle's velocity is necessary to accurately determine the interaction type.
humanist rho
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A relativistic particle travels a length of 3*10^-3 m before decaying.The decay process of this particle is dominated by...

(a)Strong interactions
(b)EM interactions
(c)weak interactions
(d)gravitational interactions.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



Since the question says the particle is relativistic, i took its velocity = c
then,
t = x/v = 10-11
which is the timescale for weak interactions.

But the text says the answer is strong interaction.
Then wheres the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you take into account time dilation?
 
How can i apply time dilation when velocity is not given?
 
Good question. Depending on how close to the speed of light the particle travels at, the 10-11 seconds in the lab frame could correspond to an arbitrarily short time interval in the particle's rest frame. I think you need more information to solve the problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top