Relativistic Particle Decay: Momentum Conservation

whatisreality
Messages
286
Reaction score
1
A particle with mass M a rest decays into two particles a and b.

I know that Ea + Eb = Mc2, from conservation of energy. But I'm pretty confused about signs in the conservation of momentum equation, and I've actually seen two versions!

pa + pb = 0, so

pa = - pb.

But I've also seen pa = pb! I know one is magnitudes and the other takes account of directions. Both are right, but which applies for the situation described above? As in, don't they conflict?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momenta include directions as well as magnitudes, so you need to specify directions. In that case, the correct equation is: ##\vec{p}_a+\vec{p}_b=0## assuming you are in the rest frame of the parent particle.
 
Some authors use bold font to denote a vector ##\textbf{p}## and an italic font to denote the length of a vector ##p##. Under this convention, $$
\textbf{p}_a = -\textbf{p}_b
$$implies$$
p_a = p_b
$$Similarly for authors who denote a vector with an overarrow: ##\vec{p}##

And then there are some authors who use no special font for vectors who would say:
$$
p_a = -p_b
$$implies$$
|p_a| = |p_b|
$$
 
DrGreg said:
Some authors use bold font to denote a vector ##\textbf{p}## and an italic font to denote the length of a vector ##p##. Under this convention, $$
\textbf{p}_a = -\textbf{p}_b
$$implies$$
p_a = p_b
$$Similarly for authors who denote a vector with an overarrow: ##\vec{p}##

And then there are some authors who use no special font for vectors who would say:
$$
p_a = -p_b
$$implies$$
|p_a| = |p_b|
$$
Oh, they were using bold letters on the website. Thanks, that solves it!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top