What is the Vortex Theory and why is it considered controversial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a radical claim that the current understanding of the universe, particularly through Einstein's theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, is fundamentally flawed. It argues that the foundational elements of matter, space, time, energy, and natural forces are constructed in a way that contradicts established scientific beliefs. This new perspective, introduced by the Prestigious Russian Academic Society, suggests that the entire framework of physics, chemistry, and astronomy is outdated, rendering countless textbooks and educational materials obsolete. The implications of this theory are profound, indicating that millions of students are investing in an education based on concepts that may no longer hold validity. The conversation emphasizes a need for a complete overhaul of scientific education and literature in light of these revolutionary ideas.
Saint
Messages
437
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
INTRODUCTION

A great mistake exists in science
The five pieces of the universe: matter, space, time, energy, and the forces of nature are not constructed the way science presently believes. They are constructed in a way totally unlike anything anyone has ever imagined before.
.

Their construction, creates a shocking vision of the universe unlike anything anyone has ever seen before. This revolutionary new vision of the universe is not only the Rosetta Stone of Science, it is the greatest scientific discovery ever made.
.

These revolutionary ideas are now being introduced to the world’s scientific community by the Prestigious Russian Academic Society.

______________________________________________________________________

This revolutionary vision changes everything we know:

Einstein’s theory of relativity is now obsolete

Quantum mechanics is obsolete.

The end of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics renders the scientific disciplines of physics, chemistry, and astronomy obsolete. Shockingly, every science book in the world that deals with anyone of these subjects is obsolete!

Every college science text that deals with any part of anyone of these subjects is obsolete!

Not only will a billion books throughout the world have to be discarded and rewritten, but every science course in every school, college, and university will have to be modified. Unfortunately, millions of students are paying billions of dollars for science and engineering educations that are now obsolete!
 
How?
 
we've been through this vortex theory before, crack pottery.
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Question about Parallel Transport'

In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
View full post »

Thread 'Trying to calculate proper time of worldlines using rotating frames'

So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Energy condition respecting warp drives in Einstein Cartan theory
Replies
9
Views
2K
I GR as Gauge Theory
Replies
2
Views
2K
Formation of a Starting Vortex for Symmetric Aerofoils (NACA 0015)
Replies
3
Views
3K
I The Faraday disk in the context of the theory of relativity
2
Replies
84
Views
4K
A Vortex loop stabilization in SU(N) gauge theory - DBI term approach
Replies
4
Views
204
I Symmetry of motion in the special theory of relativity
Replies
37
Views
2K
I Does string theory falsify the theory of special relativity?
Replies
19
Views
3K
I Why can coefficient "a" between spacetime intervals depend on velocity between systems?
Replies
18
Views
1K
I No Symmetry Spacetimes/Metrics in Theory of Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Is Simultaneity Absolute or Relative in the Theory of Relativity?
Replies
38
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top