Relativity of Simultaneity & C Invariance Doubts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relativity of simultaneity as illustrated by the thought experiment involving a train and two bolts of lightning. The observer on the train perceives the lightning strikes as non-simultaneous due to their motion, despite being equidistant from both events. This conclusion is supported by the invariant speed of light, c, which remains constant for all observers, leading to the deduction that the lightning strikes cannot be simultaneous in the train's frame of reference. The argument emphasizes the importance of understanding that simultaneity is relative and depends on the observer's frame of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of light speed invariance
  • Knowledge of reference frames in physics
  • Basic comprehension of thought experiments in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity in detail
  • Explore the implications of light speed invariance on different reference frames
  • Investigate additional thought experiments related to simultaneity
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations and their role in relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching relativity concepts, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of modern physics.

printfede
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm trying to understand relativity for the first time. First of all I'm sorry for my bad English, I'll try to be as clear as possible.
My doubt is the following: In my books and on many web sites I have red the thought experiment of the train and the two bolts of lightning to explain the relativity of the simultaneity ( like that in this video). In this thought experiment the observer on the train perceives the two events (the bolts of lightning at the end of the vehicle) as not simultaneous because, going to the right, he is reached first by the light beam coming from the right, though he is at the same distance from both events. But I think it implies that if the train has a speed of v in relation to the ground, the speed of the light beam coming from the right in relation to the train should be c+v, and that of the light beam coming from the left c-v, because if the speed of the two beams of light were c for both the beams the observer on the train would be reached simultaneusly by them, but it's in contrast to the SR imho.
If i wasn't clear please tell me. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
printfede said:
because if the speed of the two beams of light were c for both the beams the observer on the train would be reached simultaneusly by them, but it's in contrast to the SR imho.
No. You could only conclude that if the two lightning flashes occurred simultaneously according to the train frame observers. But they don't.

The argument is this: Looking at things from the ground frame, we can prove that the light from each flash will reach the observer in the middle of the train at different times. (This is a fact true for everyone.) Then using this fact, and the fact that the speed of light is c for everyone, we can deduce that the lightning flashes could not have occurred simultaneously in the train frame.
 
Thanks for the answer. Brief and clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 221 ·
8
Replies
221
Views
17K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
10K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K