Relativity question involving time dilation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a muon's lifetime and its behavior at relativistic speeds. The muon, at rest, has a lifetime of 2.20 microseconds, and when moving at 0.99 times the speed of light, time dilation affects its observed lifetime. Calculations show that, according to Newtonian mechanics, the muon would travel approximately 653.4 meters before decaying, while relativistic effects extend its lifetime to about 9.8 microseconds, allowing it to travel around 2910.6 meters. The discrepancy in distances highlights the significance of time dilation, providing strong evidence for the theory of relativity. Proper notation and unit specification are emphasized for clarity in calculations.
MiniOreo1998
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A muon has a lifetime of 2.20 x 106 s when at rest, after which time it decays into other particles.

A) Ignore any effects of relativity discussed in this section. If the muon was moving at 0.99 c, how far would it travel before decaying into other particles, according to Newtonian mechanics?

B) How long would the muon last, according to an observer in Earth's reference frame or referenced who viewed the muon moving at 0.99 c?

C) How far would the muon actually travel, when viewed moving at 0.99 c?

D) Compare the two distances travelled. Explain why this type of evidence is excellent support for the theory of relativity.

I'm unsure of B and C. Any help would be appreciated!

Homework Equations


Δtm = Δts / √ 1 - v2 / c2

The Attempt at a Solution



A)
0.99 (3 x 108 = 2.97 x 10 8
2.97 x 10 8 (2.20 x 10 -6 = 653.4

B)
Δtm = Δts / √ 1 - v2 / c2
Δtm = 2.20 x 10-6 / 1 - 0.99 (3.0 x 108)2
Δtm = 9.8 x 10-6

C)
0.99 (3 x108 (9.8 x 10-6= 2910.6 m

D) As the particle approaches the speed of light time dilation becomes more prevalent, causing the muon to last longer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MiniOreo1998 said:
Δtm = Δts / √ 1 - v2 / c2
Δtm = 2.20 x 10-6 / 1 - 0.99 (3.0 x 108)2

Your math is off. It is also impossible to tell exactly what you are doing because you are not writing out parentheses and units properly. Parentheses are important in order for your expressions to be readable to anyone, including yourself. Physical quantities always has units. You cannot say that Δt = 2.2 without specifying which units you are using.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top